Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nitesh Kumar @ Nitish Kumar @ Nitesh ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, subject to bond and appearance conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar, was arrested after 200 litres of liquor were recovered from an e‑rickshaw he was driving, and he was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was merely the driver, had no knowledge of the contraband, and that no incriminating material was found in his possession; he also highlighted the lack of compliance with Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and his clean criminal record. The State opposed his bail application. Considering the circumstances, the court found the petitioner’s claim credible and, noting the period of custody already served, decided to grant bail. The bail was conditioned on a bond of Rs.15,000 with two sureties, one of whom must be a close family member, and on the petitioner’s appearance at every trial date, with cancellation possible after two consecutive defaults. The order was pronounced by Justice Rudra Prakash Mishra.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriateness of granting bail to the accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act given the facts of the case?
  • Whether the non‑compliance with Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, affects the bail eligibility of the petitioner.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition law
  • excise
  • driver liability
  • Section 30
  • Section 103
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91157 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-902 Year-2025 Thana- PIRBAHOR District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Nitesh Kumar @ Nitish Kumar @ Nitesh Manjhi S/o Late Anil Ram @ Late
                 Anil Manjhi R/o Village - Garhwa Tola, Shiv Mandir, P.S. - Sultanganj,
                 District - Patna.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Khushi Awadh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-01-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Pirabhore P.S. Case No. 902 of 2025, instituted for the offences

                   punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act.

                                3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 200 liters

                   liquor was recovered from E-rickshaw and the petitioner was

                   arrested on spot.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from

                   the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91157 of 2025(2) dt.19-01-2026
                                            2/3




          no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel

          for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner is not the

          owner of the E-rickshaw in question rather he is driver of that

          vehicle and has got no knowledge with regard to the nature of

          goods loaded in the vehicle. The petitioner is in custody since

          13.11.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no

          compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

          Sanhita, 2023.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case and the period of custody undergone by the

          petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail after framing

          of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of

          Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned

          Court in connection with Pirabhore P.S. Case No. 902 of 2025,

          subject to the following conditions:

                       (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of

          the family of the petitioner.

                       (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91157 of 2025(2) dt.19-01-2026
                                                         3/3




                       fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two

                       consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the

                       bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                                                   (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Rajorshi/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.