Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the stipulated conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Sintu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Hisua P.S. Case No. 367 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 234 litres of liquor recovered from a tempo and a motorcycle. The prosecution alleged the liquor recovery, while the petitioner contended he was neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicles and had no criminal antecedent. His counsel argued that no prima facie case existed and that Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, had not been complied with. The State opposed the bail. The Court, after considering the facts, granted anticipatory bail on the condition that the petitioner surrenders within six weeks, furnishes a bail bond of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties of equal amount, and complies with Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances.
  • Whether there is a prima facie case against the petitioner under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the requirements of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, have been complied with.
  • Whether Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, permits the grant of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 103
  • Section 482(2)
  • liquor seizure
  • criminal procedure
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91288 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-367 Year-2025 Thana- HISUWA District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Sintu Kumar Son of Late Kapil Deo Prasad R/o Village - Shivganj, P.S. -
                 Nardiganj, Dist. - Nawada.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-01-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                               2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Hisua P.S. Case No. 367 of 2025 instituted for the offences

                   under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                               3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 234

                   litres of liquor was recovered from tempo and motorcycle.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

                   petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.

                   Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner is neither the

                   owner nor the driver of the vehicles in question. The petitioner

                   has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned

                   counsel, therefore, submitted that prima-facie, no case is made
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91288 of 2025(2) dt.19-01-2026
                                                       2/2




                     out against the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal

                     antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the

                     Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

                                 5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

                     the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                                  6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                     of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of

                     arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period

                     of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on

                     furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand)

                     with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                     Court below/concerned Court in connection with Hisua P.S.

                     Case No. 367 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down

                     under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha

                     Sanhita, 2023.



                                           (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Alok Verma/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.