Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pramod MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed the petition.

Summary

Petitioner Pramod Mahto filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was apprehended by the authorities. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner has been apprehended

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • bail
  • High Court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91300 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-469 Year-2025 Thana- BANJARIA District- East Champaran
                  ======================================================
                  Pramod Mahto S/o Late Faguni Mahto R/o Village - Chailaha (Lala Tola), P.S
                  - Banjariya, District - East Champaran

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Prateek Tandon
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Sanjay Kumar
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    12-01-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks

                    permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application

                    as petitioner during pendency of the same was apprehended.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.


                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.