Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shankar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner.

Summary

Shankar Rai was arrested in connection with the recovery of 126.45 litres of liquor from a jute sack and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that the liquor was recovered from a sack that did not belong to him, that it was found in an open public place, and that no incriminating material was found in his possession; he also highlighted his lack of prior criminal record and the alleged non‑compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The State opposed the bail application. After considering the facts, the period of custody since 22‑11‑2025, and the absence of strong evidential material, the Court decided to grant bail. The petitioner was ordered to furnish a bail bond of Rs.15,000 with two sureties of the same amount. The order was pronounced by Justice Rudra Prakash Mishra.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act considering the circumstances of arrest and evidence.
  • Whether the alleged non‑compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, affects the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition law
  • excise
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 103
  • criminal procedure
  • possession of liquor
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91458 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2025 Thana- KANHAULI District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
                 Shankar Rai S/O Batahu Rai R/O village - Araria @ Arariya, P.S.- Kanhauli,
                 Dist. - Sitamarhi

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Akbar Ali, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-01-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Kanhauli P.S. Case No. 174 of 2025, instituted for the offences

                   punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act.

                                3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 126.45 liters

                   liquor was recovered from jute sack and the petitioner was

                   arrested on spot.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from

                   the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91458 of 2025(2) dt.19-01-2026
                                                         2/2




                       no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel

                       for the petitioner also submits that the alleged recovery has been

                       made from jute sack which does not belong to the petitioner and

                       the same has been recovered in an open place which is easily

                       accessible to the public at large. The petitioner is in custody

                       since 22.11.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is

                       no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik

                       Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

                                    5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

                       the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                                    6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                       of the case and the period of custody undergone by the

                       petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                                    7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

                       bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two

                       sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

                       below/concerned Court in connection with Kanhauli P.S. Case

                       No. 174 of 2025.



                                                                   (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Rajorshi/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.