Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner with conditions of cooperation and physical presence in court.

Summary

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a theft of a bike and mobile, alleged to have occurred when three persons on a bike intercepted him. He sought bail for the offence under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023, claiming innocence and that he was falsely implicated, noting that the only evidence against him was a confessional statement made in a separate case (Andar P.S. Case No. 238 of 2025). The State opposed bail, highlighting the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent. The court examined the lack of substantive evidence beyond the confessional statement and considered the petitioner’s prolonged pre‑trial detention since 15 September 2025. Weighing the circumstances, the court decided to grant bail, subject to the petitioner’s cooperation with the trial and physical presence on all court dates. The bail was conditioned on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023 in view of the alleged theft, the confessional statement, and his prior criminal antecedent

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Section 309(4)
  • confessional statement
  • prior criminal antecedent
  • theft

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91512 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-225 Year-2025 Thana- AANDAR District- Siwan
                 ======================================================
                 Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Kumar Sah Son of Rajkumar Sah Resident of village-
                 Faridpur, P.S.-Hussaianganj, District-Siwan

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Satyendra Rai, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   11-03-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with

                   Andar P.S. Case No. 225 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short is that as the

                   informant was returning from his office and reached near Andar

                   more, three persons on a bike followed him and intercepted him.

                   After that, his bike and mobile were snatched.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

                   has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no

                   offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also

                   submits that the petitioner was remanded in this case from Andar

                   P.S. Case No. 238 of 2025, wherein he has given his confessional
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91512 of 2025(3) dt.11-03-2026
                                                       2/2




                     statement that he was also involved in this case as well and in that

                     case, the said bike was recovered. He also submits that save and

                     except confessional statement there is nothing against the

                     petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in

                     judicial custody since 15.09.2025.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal

                     antecedent of one case.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the condition that

                     the petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall remain

                     physically present on each and every date fixed by the learned

                     trial court. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged

                     on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand

                     only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction

                     of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Siwan in connection

                     with Andar P.S. Case No. 225 of 2025.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.