Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rajendra RajwanshiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court held that the anticipatory bail application may be withdrawn upon the petitioner's request and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Rajendra Rajwanshi was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending. His counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. No further orders were made.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of bail
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91825 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-516 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada
                  ======================================================
                  Rajendra Rajwanshi S/o Late Vaso Rajwanshi @ Baso Rajwanshi R/o vill-
                  Sohada, P.S.- Rajauli, Distt.- Nawada

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Shankar Kumar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Renuka Ratnakar (App.125)
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    13-01-2026               1.    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                              2.    Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, as petitioner was

                    arrested during pendency of the instant anticipatory bail

                    application.

                              3.    Permission is accorded.

                              4.    Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.