Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rohit Raj @ Rohit KrversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed the petition.

Summary

Rohit Raj filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail petition. The court, after hearing counsel for the petitioner and the State, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an applicant may withdraw an anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • Criminal Procedure Code

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91888 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2023 Thana- NAWADA MUFFASIL District- Nawada
                  ======================================================
                  Rohit Raj @ Rohit Kr S/O Mukesh Kr @ Mukesh @ Ranjan Singh R/O
                  Village - Oraina P.S.- Muffasil Dist.- Nawada
                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                  The State of Bihar
                                                                ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Arjun Prasad
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh
                                                  Mr.Sidhendra Narayan Singh
                                                  Mr. Kumar Lalit
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

5    30-04-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                    A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf

                    of the informant.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks

                    permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application

                    as petitioner, during pendency of the anticipatory bail

                    application, was arrested.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.


                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.