Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shambhu SadaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court held that an anticipatory bail application may be withdrawn with the court's permission.

Summary

Shambhu Sada was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending. He sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The petitioner’s counsel requested withdrawal and the court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted. The court granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the applicant has been arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.92089 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2025 Thana- BIRPUR District- Supaul
                  ======================================================
                  Shambhu Sada S/O Shivjee Sada @ Shibji Sada Residents Of Village-
                  Balbhadrapur (Balbhadarpur), Ward no. 1, P.s.- Birpur, District- Supaul

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Bhim Kumar Yadav, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    13-01-2026                     1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                                    2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

                    that petitioner during pendency of the anticipatory bail

                    application was arrested, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the

                    same.

                                    3. Permission is accorded.

                                    4. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail

                    application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                       (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.