Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court held that the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, was involved in a criminal miscellaneous case (No.9209 of 2026) arising from a police report in Bhagwanganj, Patna. The trial had already commenced when the petitioner filed a regular bail application before the High Court of Patna. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application, citing difficulty in pursuing it. The court, after hearing the counsel, granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw his regular bail application at the stage of trial and the court may permit such withdrawal.

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court of Patna
  • Criminal Miscellaneous

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9209 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWANGANJ District- Patna
                  ======================================================
                  Raushan Kumar Son of Krishna Singh Resident of Village- Gafurichak, P.S.-
                  Bhagwanganj, District- Patna
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
                  The State of Bihar
                                                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Vijay Anand, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Binod Kumar, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    23-04-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

                    learned APP for the State.

                                 2. On query of the Court with regard to the stage of

                    the case, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits

                    that trial has commenced.

                                 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner, thereafter,

                    argued vehemently for some times, but then realizing his

                    difficulty seeks permission to withdraw the regular bail

                    application.

                                 4. Permission is accorded.

                                 5. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.


                                                         (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Rishabh/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.