Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Birendra MandalversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

Regular bail was denied because the petitioners had repeatedly failed to surrender after withdrawal of anticipatory bail, indicating a high risk of absconding.

Summary

The petitioners, Birendra and Vijay Mandal, were charged in a 2014 case for offences including murder, robbery, and illegal possession of arms. They had previously obtained anticipatory bail, which was later withdrawn on the condition that they surrender and apply for regular bail. Instead of surrendering, they absconded for ten years and later filed another anticipatory bail, which was also withdrawn. The court noted their repeated failure to surrender and the serious nature of the charges, concluding that granting regular bail would pose a risk of further absconding. Consequently, the court rejected the petitioners' regular bail application.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail can be granted to accused who have previously withdrawn anticipatory bail and failed to surrender for an extended period
  • Whether the risk of absconding justifies denial of bail in a murder case

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • anticipatory bail
  • regular bail
  • absconding
  • murder
  • IPC
  • Arms Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9364 of 2026

                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2014 Thana- KAUWAKOL District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
           1.    Birendra Mandal S/O Bishundeo Mandal R/O Village- Rustampur- Kauakol,
                 P.S- Kauwakol, Distt.- Nawada.
           2.    Vijay Mandal S/O Bishundeo Mandal R/O Village- Rustampur- Kauakol,
                 P.S- Kauwakol, Distt.- Nawada.


                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar


                                                                           ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                                  ORAL ORDER


2   06-02-2026                   1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

                   learned APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with

                   Kauwakol (Kawakole) P.S. Case No. 49 of 2014 registered for

                   the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 379,

                   302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of

                   the Arms Act.

                                 3. The Court is not inclined to release the petitioners
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9364 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026
                                            2/3




          on bail for the reason that petitioners had earlier moved before

          this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Criminal

          Miscellaneous No. 44103 of 2015 and the same was permitted

          to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to surrender

          and seek regular bail. It appears that after the order dated

          15.10.2015 was passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 44103

          of 2015, the petitioners instead of surrendering and seeking

          regular bail kept absconding despite the fact that they were

          aware that their anticipatory bail application was withdrawn

          with liberty to surrender and seek regular bail.

                       4. From perusal of Annexure-2 to the instant regular

          bail application, it would manifest that petitioners had again

          filed an anticipatory bail application being Criminal

          Miscellaneous No. 58199 of 2025 and the same again was

          permitted to be withdrawn by an order dated 08.09.2025, as

          such, the petitioners instead of surrendering earlier, in terms

          of the order passed in the year 2015 at their leisure, again

          moved for second anticipatory bail before this Court in the

          year 2025, which again was permitted to be withdrawn.

                       5. Present is a case of murder and if petitioners are

          enlarged on regular bail, they may abscond, as despite being

          aware      of    the     order     dated      15.10.2015   in   Criminal
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9364 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026
                                                        3/3




                      Miscellaneous No. 44103 of 2015, the petitioners did not

                      surrender for 10 years that shows their conduct.

                                   6. Accordingly,            the     instant   regular   bail

                      application is rejected.



                                                              (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.