Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bir Bahadur KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner, directing release upon furnishing a bail bond and two sureties.

Summary

Bir Bahadur Kumar, son of a pension‑holder informant, was arrested on 27‑11‑2025 in connection with a case (PS‑570/2025) alleging assault on his mother by his sister‑in‑law. The FIR implicates him under Sections 117(2), 118(2), 110, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS, but the petitioner’s counsel argued that the complaint does not specifically allege his participation and that he has a clean antecedent. The State opposed the bail, contending the seriousness of the offences. The Court examined the lack of direct accusation against the petitioner and his willingness to cooperate, and concluded that regular bail could be granted. Accordingly, the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties of the same amount, subject to the trial court’s satisfaction.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite charges under Sections 117(2), 118(2), 110, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS.
  • Whether the FIR contains a specific allegation of assault against the petitioner.
  • Whether the petitioner poses a risk of absconding or tampering with evidence.

Legislation cited

  • BNS — s. 110, 117(2), 118(2), 3(5), 351(2), 351(3)

Subjects

  • bail
  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Indian Penal Code
  • BNS
  • clean antecedent
  • surety

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9473 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-570 Year-2025 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad
                 ======================================================
                 Bir Bahadur Kumar S/o Late Ramnirit Yadav @ Ramnrit Yadav R/o vill -
                 Ganesh Bigha, P.S.- Karauna, Distt.- Jehanabad
                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Vijay Anand, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Roop Kishan, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Parashuram Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-05-2026                   1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 117(2), 118(2), 110, 351(2),

                   351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS.

                                 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is in custody

                   since 27.11.2025. It is further submitted that informant alleges

                   that she is a pension-holder and her son (petitioner) on

                   24.06.2025 was quarreling with her for money when her

                   daughter-in-law (Neelam) came and assaulted the informant by

                   an iron rod causing injury over her eyes.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9473 of 2026(2) dt.04-05-2026
                                                       2/2




                     manifest that informant is the mother of the petitioner and

                     alleges that petitioner was quarreling with her for money when

                     her daughter-in-law came and assaulted her. It is further

                     submitted that there is no specific allegation of assault against

                     the petitioner. It is next submitted that if the privilege of regular

                     bail is granted to the petitioner, the petitioner will not abscond

                     rather will cooperate in the trial to prove his innocence.

                                  5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes

                     the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

                                  6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

                     counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner,

                     above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing

                     bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

                     sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                     Trial Court where the case is pending in connection with

                     Jehanabad (Karauna) P.S. Case No. 570 of 2025.


                                                                         (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Kundan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.