Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ajay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioners subject to monetary and procedural conditions.

Summary

The petitioners, Ajay Kumar and Vikash Kumar, were arrested on 11 January 2026 after 161.670 litres of liquor were recovered from railway tracks in Gaya. They were charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioners contended that they had no possession of the liquor or the bags, that the bags were unattended in a public place, and that no incriminating material linked them to the offence; they also highlighted the lack of compliance with Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The State opposed the bail application. Considering the absence of direct evidence, the petitioners' clean record (except two prior cases for petitioner‑2), and the period of custody already served, the Court inclined to grant bail. The Court ordered release on bail with a bond of Rs.15,000 each, two sureties, and conditions regarding family surety and regular appearance before the trial court.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the lack of incriminating material and non‑compliance with Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, justify bail.
  • Whether the period of custody already undergone warrants release on bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition law
  • excise
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar
  • railway
  • possession
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 103

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9605 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2026 Thana- GAYA RAIL P.S. District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
           1.     Ajay Kumar Son of Late Surendra Paswan @ Surendra Prasad Resident of
                  village- Dulhinganj Lane, Bata More, P.S-. Kotwali, District- Gaya Bihar
           2.    Vikash Kumar Son of Raju Chaudhary Resident Of Village- Ward no. 2,
                 Chotki Delha, Ps- Delha, Dist- Gaya,

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mrs. Sangeeta Sharma, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-02-2026                            Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Rail

                   Gaya P.S. Case No. 07 of 2026, instituted for the offences

                   punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act.

                                3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 161.670 liters

                   liquor was recovered from railway track in bags and both the

                   petitioners were arrested on spot.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

                   petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9605 of 2026(2) dt.12-02-2026
                                            2/3




          the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have

          got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned

          counsel for the petitioners also submitted that the petitioners

          have got no concern with the alleged bags. It is further

          submitted that the alleged recovery has been made from

          unattended bags near railway station and the same is an open

          place which is easily accessible to the public at large. The

          petitioners are in custody since 11.01.2026. Petitioner no. 1 has

          got no criminal antecedent and petitioner no. 2 has got two

          criminal antecedents in which he is on bail. There is no

          compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

          Sanhita, 2023.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case and the period of custody undergone by the

          petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

                       7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) each with

          two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

          below/concerned Court in connection with Rail Gaya P.S. Case

          No. 07 of 2026, subject to the following conditions:
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9605 of 2026(2) dt.12-02-2026
                                                         3/3




                                    (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of

                       the family of the petitioners.

                                    (II) The petitioners shall appear on each and every

                       date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on

                       two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel

                       the bail bonds of the petitioners.



                                                                    (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Rajorshi/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.