Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pankaj kumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail should be granted to the petitioner subject to conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar, was arrested on 10 January 2026 after 103.680 litres of liquor were recovered from a car he was driving, and he was charged under Sections 30(a), 41 and 56(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the contraband, that no incriminating material was found on his person, and that he had no prior criminal record. The State opposed his bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The court noted the lack of material linking the petitioner to the liquor, the absence of a criminal antecedent, and the non‑compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Considering these factors and the period of custody already served, the court decided to grant bail. Bail was conditioned on a bond of Rs.15,000 with two sureties, one of whom must be a close family member, and on the petitioner’s regular appearance before the trial court.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor.
  • Whether the absence of incriminating material and the petitioner’s clean record justify bail despite the seriousness of the offences.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise
  • liquor possession
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • criminal procedure
  • driver
  • section 103 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9643 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Pankaj kumar Son of Late Pannalal Singh R/o Village - Sandalpur Kumhrar,
                 P.S - Bahadurpur, Distt. - Patna.


                                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
                 The State of Bihar


                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Binay Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mrs. Shaheen Begum, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-02-2026                      Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Excise

                   P.S. Case No. 150 of 2026, instituted for the offences punishable

                   under Sections 30(a), 41 and 56(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act.

                                3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 103.680 liters

                   liquor was recovered from car and the petitioner was arrested on

                   spot.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9643 of 2026(2) dt.12-02-2026
                                            2/3




          the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got

          no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel

          for the petitioner also submitted that the petitioner is driver of

          the car in question and has got no knowledge with regard to the

          nature of goods loaded in the vehicle. The petitioner is in

          custody since 10.01.2026 and has got no criminal antecedent.

          There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik

          Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case and the period of custody undergone by the

          petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

          below/concerned Court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No.

          150 of 2026, subject to the following conditions:

                       (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of

          the family of the petitioner.

                       (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

          fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9643 of 2026(2) dt.12-02-2026
                                                         3/3




                       consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the

                       bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                                                    (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Rajorshi/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.