Patna High Court
Binda Rai @ Binda Gope @ Binda Gop @ Vinda RayversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The petition for bail is dismissed; the petitioner is not entitled to bail.
Summary
The petitioner, Binda Rai, was charged under several serious provisions of the Indian Penal Code, including sections 341, 342, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 and 302/34. He previously applied for regular bail in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 29206 of 2025, which the Patna High Court rejected on 6 August 2025. The present application is his second attempt to obtain bail for the same case (Session Trial No. 11 of 2019 arising out of Raghopur PS). The Court examined the earlier order and found no new material or change in circumstances that would justify granting bail. Consequently, the Court upheld its earlier view and denied the bail petition. The order was pronounced by Justice Satyavrat Verma.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail for offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 and 302/34 of the IPC, considering the earlier denial of bail.
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code — s. 302/34, 307, 323, 324, 341, 342, 504, 506
Subjects
- bail
- Indian Penal Code
- criminal procedure
- high court
- serious offences
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9998 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2016 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali
======================================================
Binda Rai @ Binda Gope @ Binda Gop @ Vinda Ray S/o- Ram Chandra Rai
@ Rachandra Rai R/o Village- Saidabad PS-Raghopur Dist- Vaishali
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar Deo, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 04-05-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the
offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 323, 324, 307,
504, 506 and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner had earlier moved before this Court seeking regular
bail by filing Cr. Misc. No. 29206 of 2025 and the same came to
be rejected vide order dated 06.08.2025 by this Court. It is
further submitted that this is the second attempt of the petitioner
to seek bail.
4. The Court has gone through the order dated
06.08.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 29206 of 2025 and, thus, finds no
reason to release the petitioner on bail.
5. Hence, the prayer for bail is rejected in connection
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9998 of 2026(2) dt.04-05-2026
2/2
with Session Trial No. 11 of 2019 arising out of Raghopur P.S.
Case No. 97 of 2016 pending in the Court of learned 11th
Additional Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur/Successor Court.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Kundan/-
U T
Checking your session…