Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

BEBI DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court permitted the withdrawal of the revision petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Bebi Devi filed a criminal revision petition (Criminal Revision No.232 of 2023) arising from PS Case No.81 of 2016 in Munger. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw the revision petition. The court considered the request and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. Accordingly, the court granted permission to withdraw the petition. As a result, the revision petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the criminal revision petition?

Subjects

  • revision petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • court discretion

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                         CRIMINAL REVISION No.232 of 2023
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2016 Thana- DHARHARA District- Munger
                  ======================================================
                  Bebi Devi Wife of Kailash Yadav Resident of Village Bari Govindpur,
                  Jamalpur, P.S Dharhara, District Munger.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s      :        Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, Adv.
                  For the State             :        Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    16-03-2026                   After some arguments, learned counsel for the

                    petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present revision

                    petition.

                                  2. Permission is accorded.

                                  3. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed

                    as withdrawn.


                                                (Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

amitkumar/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.