Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

ARSHAD ZAMANversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court held that the petitioner may withdraw the criminal revision petition and accordingly dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Arshad Zaman, filed a criminal revision petition (No. 639 of 2023) before the Patna High Court challenging a decision of the lower court. During the hearing on 23-03-2026, the petitioner's counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered whether a pending criminal revision could be withdrawn at the petitioner's request. No substantive merits of the original revision were examined. The Court granted the petitioner's request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may be permitted to withdraw a pending criminal revision petition before the High Court

Subjects

  • criminal revision
  • withdrawal of petition
  • high court procedure
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                         CRIMINAL REVISION No.639 of 2023
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-503 Year-2003 Thana- KOTWALI District- Patna
                  ======================================================
                  ARSHAD ZAMAN SON OF LATE BADIUZ ZAMAN RESIDENT OF
                  180E PATLIPUTRA COLONY, PS- PATLIPUTRA DIST- PATNA

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  THE STATE OF BIHAR PATNA

                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s      :        Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate
                                                     Mr. Purushottam Kumar, Advocate
                                                     Ms. Kajal, Advocate
                  For the Respondent/s      :        Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    23-03-2026                   Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to

                    withdraw the instant petition.

                                  2. Permission is granted.

                                  3. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed

                    as withdrawn.



                                                (Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

K.C.Jha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.