Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bulet Yadav @ Bulat YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court held that the petitioner may file a petition under Rule 12A of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Rules, 2022 as amended by 2023 to seek release of the vehicle upon payment of the prescribed penalty.

Summary

The petitioner, Bulat Yadav, challenged the confiscation of his motorcycle ordered by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate following an excise case where illicit liquor was recovered from the vehicle. He sought quashing of the confiscation order and release of the motorcycle. The Court examined Rule 12A of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Rules, 2022, which allows the owner to pay a penalty and obtain release of the vehicle during pending confiscation or auction proceedings. The Court held that a petition under Rule 12A is maintainable even while auction proceedings are ongoing. Accordingly, the Court granted the petitioner liberty to file a petition under Rule 12A within four weeks, after which the competent authority must decide on the release; the writ petition was disposed without quashing the original order.

Issues considered

  • Whether the order of confiscation and the subsequent auction proceedings can be quashed by a writ petition.
  • Whether a petition under Rule 12A of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Rules, 2022 is maintainable during the pendency of auction proceedings.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • confiscation
  • excise law
  • motor vehicle
  • writ petition
  • Rule 12A
  • penalty
  • auction
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12134 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Bulet Yadav @ Bulat Yadav, Gender-Male, Son of Prabhu Yadav, Resident of
                 Village- Sital Bardaha, P.S. Kuchaikote, District Gopalganj.

                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus

           1.    The State of Bihar through The Principal Secretary, Department of Excise
                 and Prohibition, Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Secretary, Bihar Prohibition and Excise, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The Commissioner, Excise, Bihar, Patna.
           4.    The Collector, Gopalganj.
           5.    The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Gopalganj.
           6.    The Superintendent of Police, Excise, Gopalganj.
           7.    The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj.
           8.    The District Excise Officer, Gopalganj.
           9.    The Officer-in-Charge, Town Police Station, District Gopalganj.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :

                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Pratik Kumar, AC to GA 11

                 ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
                                               and
                          HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

                     (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)

4   09-02-2026                  The present writ petition has been filed for quashing

                   the order dated 03.12.2024 passed by the Commissioner, Excise,

                   Bihar, Patna in Excise Appeal Case No.96 of 2024 (arising out

                   of Gopalganj Town P.S. Case No.175 of 2024 registered under

                   Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 on

                   account of recovery of 27 liters of country made illicit liquor
Patna High Court CWJC No.12134 of 2025(4) dt.09-02-2026
                                           2/4




          from the Splendor Plus motorcycle of the petitioner bearing

          registration No.-BR-28 AA 4619), whereby and whereunder the

          order passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Gopalganj

          pertaining to confiscation of vehicle in question has been

          upheld. The confiscation order dated 05.07.2024 passed by the

          Sub-Divisional        Magistrate,      Gopalganj       in    Sub-Divisional

          Confiscation (Excise) Case No.389 of 2024, whereby and

          whereunder direction has been issued for confiscation of the

          motorcycle of the petitioner, is also under challenge. The

          petitioner has also prayed for release of the aforesaid vehicle in

          question.

                      2. We find, from perusal of Rule 12 A of the Bihar

          Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Rules, 2022 (hereinafter

          referred to as the ‘Rules, 2022’) that an explanation has been

          provided therein which reads as under:-

                                      [Explanation: In all pending/ongoing
                         cases of confiscation/ auction of vehicles, the
                         Collector or the officer authorized by him may
                         give an opportunity to the existing owner to
                         pay the aforesaid penalty and get the vehicle
                         released. Upon satisfaction about ownership
                         and upon payment of such penalty, the ongoing
                         confiscation/auction             proceeding   may    be
                         dropped and the vehicle released.]"
Patna High Court CWJC No.12134 of 2025(4) dt.09-02-2026
                                           3/4




                      3. In view of the aforesaid, we have put a query to the

          learned counsel appearing for the State that in view of the

          aforesaid explanation to Rule 12 A of the Rules, 2022 whether

          during the pendency of auction proceedings, a petition under

          Rule 12 A for release of vehicle on payment of penalty would be

          maintainable, to which the answer is in the affirmative.

                      4. Having regard to the fact and circumstances of the

          case and in view of the submission of the petitioner, to the effect

          that liberty be granted to the petitioner to file appropriate

          petition under Rule 12 A of the Rules, 2022 as amended by the

          Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Rules, 2023

          (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Rules, 2023’), we deem it fit and

          proper to grant liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate

          petition under Rule 12 A of the Rules, 2022 as amended by the

          Rules, 2023.

                      5. It is needless to state that in case appropriate

          petition is filed by the petitioner under Rule 12 A of the Rules,

          2022 as amended by the Rules, 2023 within a period of four

          weeks from today, the competent authority shall consider the

          same on merits and pass a reasoned and a speaking order within

          a period of four weeks, thereafter, in case the motorcycle in

          question has not been auctioned.
          Patna High Court CWJC No.12134 of 2025(4) dt.09-02-2026
                                                     4/4




                                6. Accordingly, present writ petition stands disposed

                    of on the aforesaid terms.



                                                       (Mohit Kumar Shah, J)


                                                       (Alok Kumar Pandey, J)
GAURAV S./-
U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.