Patna High Court
Sanjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- AJIT KUMAR
Holding
The Court held that the District Magistrate-cum-District Arms Magistrate must decide the pending arms licence application within eight weeks and communicate the order to the petitioner.
Summary
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Bihar and its officials to grant him a license for an NP bore rifle under the Arms Act. He had earlier submitted an application in the prescribed format to the District Magistrate-cum-District Arms Magistrate of Nawada on 24‑06‑2024, but no decision had been taken. The petitioner argued that the statutory duty to decide the application within a reasonable time had been ignored. The State contended that the application was properly filed and the competent authority must adjudicate it according to law. The Court directed the District Magistrate to pass a final order on the licence application within eight weeks and to communicate the order to the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ application was disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether the District Magistrate-cum-District Arms Magistrate has failed to decide the petitioner’s arms licence application within a reasonable time as mandated by the Arms Act.
- Whether the High Court can issue a direction compelling the authority to decide the pending licence application.
Legislation cited
Subjects
- Arms licence
- Arms Act
- NP bore rifle
- District Magistrate
- Administrative delay
- Writ petition
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12590 of 2025
======================================================
Sanjay Kumar Son of Chandrika Prasad, Resident of Village- Hurrahi, P.O.-
Makhar, P.S.- Akbarpur, District- Nawada. .. ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Home
Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The District Magistrate-cum-District- Arms Magistrate, Nawada.
3. The Superintendent of Police, Nawada.
4. The Sub Divisional Superintendent of Police, Rajauli.
5. The Sub Divisional Officer, Rajauli.
6. The Officer-in-Charge, Akbarpur.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Government Advocate (08)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
3 15-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned AC to GA-08.
2. The writ application has been filed seeking a
direction commanding the respondents authorities to grant
license of NP Bore Rifle to the petitioner in terms of provisions
of Arms Act and to dispose of the application dated 24.06.2024
filed by the petitioner which is said to be pending before the
Respondent No.2/The District Magistrate-cum-District Arms
Magistrate, Nawada.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an
application in the prescribed format has already been filed
before the District Magistrate, Nawada, which is appended to
the writ application as Annexure-P/1. However, till date, no
action has been taken with regard to the grant of an arms
license. It is further submitted that, as per the provisions of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.12590 of 2025(3) dt.15-04-2026
2/2
Arms Act, a license may be granted for ensuring the safety of
life and property upon an application being made. Despite the
application having been filed on 24.06.2024, no decision has yet
been taken.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State
submits that since the application has already been made in the
prescribed format, the competent authority is required to
adjudicate the same by passing an appropriate order in
accordance with law.
5. In view of the submissions made on behalf of the
parties, the District Magistrate, Nawada, is directed to take a
final decision on the petitioner’s application for grant of an arms
license within a period of eight weeks from today. The order so
passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner within the
said period.
6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the
instant writ application stands disposed.
(Ajit Kumar, J)
perwez
U
Checking your session…