Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation and ordered the Circle Officer to initiate encroachment proceedings, with a final order under Section 6(1) and 6(2) of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act if encroachment is confirmed.

Summary

The petitioner, Ajit Kumar, filed a writ petition alleging that respondents Rinki Devi and Deepak Kumar were illegally encroaching on a 0.28 decimal parcel of Bihar Government land used as a common village road. He relied on information obtained under the Right to Information Act which identified the land as "Gairmazarua Malik Land" and confirmed the encroachment. The State acknowledged the encroachment and suggested that proceedings be initiated under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956. The Court did not grant an immediate restraining order but directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation with supporting material before the Circle Officer. The Court ordered the Circle Officer to commence encroachment proceedings, hear all parties, and, if encroachment is confirmed, pass a final order under Section 6(1) and 6(2) of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act for removal of the encroachment. The writ petition was thereafter disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the land in question is public land subject to the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956.
  • Whether the Court should issue a writ restraining the alleged encroachers or direct administrative proceedings.
  • Whether the information obtained under the RTI Act is sufficient to initiate encroachment proceedings.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • encroachment
  • public land
  • writ petition
  • Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act
  • Right to Information Act
  • administrative law
  • common road
  • land dispute

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13412 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Ajit Kumar Son of Late Abhimanyu Prasad, Resident of Kotwali Chowk,
                 Ganj No. 1, Mittha Toli, Bettiah, District- West Champaran.

                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus

           1.    The State of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms
                 Department, Govt. of Bihar.
           2.    District Magistrate Cum Collector, West Champaran, Bettiah.
           3.    Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Betiah, West Champaran.
           4.    Sub-Divisional Magistrate Cum Sub- Divisional Officer, Bettiah, West
                 Champaran.
           5.    Circle Officer, Sadar Bettiah, West Champaran.
           6.    Rinki Devi, Wife of Deepak Kumar, Resident of Shiwala Ghat, Hospital
                 Road, P.S.- Bettiah, District- West Champaran.
           7.    Deepak Kumar, Son of Nand Kishore Prasad, Resident of Shiwala Ghat,
                 Hospital Road, P.S.- Bettiah, District- West Champaran.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :     Mrs. Shweta Kumarim, Advocate
                                               Mr. Dharamnath Pd. Yadav, Advocate
                                               Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Advocate
                                               Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate
                                               Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s    :     Mr. Pankaj Kumar, SC (12)
                                               Mr. Kamlesh Kishore, AC to SC-12
                 For the Nagar Nigam     :     Mr. Priyadarshan Matri Sharan, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-05-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   counsel for the State.

                                 2. The writ petition has been filed for the following

                   reliefs :-
Patna High Court CWJC No.13412 of 2025(2) dt.12-05-2026
                                           2/4




                                 “To issue appropriate writ, order or orders,
                          direction 4 or directions to Respondent No. 1, 2, 3
                          & who are not restraining the Respondent No. 6 &
                          7, who are illegally encroaching and illegally
                          making construction over the land of Bihar
                          Government situated at Mauza-Bettiah, P.S.-
                          Bettiah Sadar, District-West Champaran, Tauzi No.
                          951, Thana No. 128, Town Ward No. 17, Khata No.
                          0, Khesra No. 3917 of total Area 0.28 decimal
                          which is usually used by villagers as common Road
                          (Rasta).

                      3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          land of Bihar Government situated at Mauza-Bettiah, P.S.-

          Bettiah Sadar, District-West Champaran, Tauzi No. 951, Thana

          No. 128, Town Ward No. 17, Khata No. 0, Khesra No. 3917 of

          total Area 0.28 decimal which is usually used by villagers as

          common Road (Rasta), is a public land and the same is said to

          have been encroached by respondent No.7 and under the Right

          to Information Act (for brevity ‘RTI Act’), the information

          which was sought from the Municipal Corporation, Bettiah,

          West Champaran, the Public Information Officer-cum-Deputy

          Municipal Commissioner, Bettiah, West Champaran, has

          categorically informed the applicant that the land pertaining to

          Khesra No. 3917 of total Area 0.28 decimal, which is a

          “Gairmazarua Malik Land”, is encroached by respondent No.7,

          namely, Deepak Kumar, and upon having obtained such

          information from the concerned authority, the petitioner is said
Patna High Court CWJC No.13412 of 2025(2) dt.12-05-2026
                                           3/4




          to have made an application before the Circle Officer, Sadar

          Bettiah, West Champaran, and in spite of such application

          having been made before the Circle Officer, to initiate

          encroachment proceeding, the same is till date pending before

          the same.

                         4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State, by

          referring to Annexure-7, which is an information obtained under

          the RTI, submits that report too suggests that respondent No.7,

          is under encroachment, and the concerned authority may be

          directed to initiate proceeding and such proceedings can be

          brought to a logical conclusion by issuing notice to all affected

          parties and by resorting to the provisions of Bihar Land

          Encroachment Act, 1956.

                         5. Considering the submissions of the parties, this

          Court directs the petitioner to file a fresh representation, in

          continuation of the earlier representation (Annexure-3/1), along

          with     all     supporting     materials.      Upon   filing   of   such

          representation, the Circle Officer, Bettiah, West Champaran,

          shall initiate encroachment proceedings and, after affording an

          opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties and upon

          ascertaining that the land in question is a public land, with

          reference to Annexure-7 obtained under the RTI Act, shall
           Patna High Court CWJC No.13412 of 2025(2) dt.12-05-2026
                                                      4/4




                     proceed in accordance with law after verifying the information

                     so referred. Thereafter, the persons connected with such

                     encroachment shall also be heard and appropriate adjudication

                     shall be made within a period of three months.

                                 6. In the event, if it is found that the land is under

                     encroachment, a final order under Section 6(1) of the Bihar

                     Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 shall be passed, followed

                     by consequential proceedings under Section 6(2) of the Act for

                     removal of the encroachment and restoration of the land to its

                     encroachment-free status shall be ensured.

                                 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.



                                                  (Ajit Kumar, J)
sharun/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.