Patna High Court
Rai Raj Construction Pvt. Ltd.versusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
Holding
The writ application was held to be infructuous and was disposed of.
Summary
Rai Raj Construction Pvt. Ltd. filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and officials of the Road Construction Department. The petitioner later informed the court that the writ application had become infructuous and was no longer required. The court, per Justice Sudhir Singh, held that the application was infructuous and ordered its disposal. No substantive relief was granted, and the court directed that any pending applications, if any, also be disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition that has become infructuous should be entertained or disposed
Subjects
- civil writ
- infructuous application
- petition disposal
- Patna High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16512 of 2025
======================================================
Rai Raj Construction Pvt. Ltd. having its Corporate Office at 601, 6th floor,
Lav Kush Tower, Exhibition Road, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, District Patna
through its Director Baidya Nath Rai, aged about 53 years, Male, son of
Mahendra Rai, resident of 410, Ashiyana Plaza, Budha Marg, PS Kotwali,
District Patna, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Road
Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Engineer in Chief, Work Management, Road Construction Department,
Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Chief Engineer (South), Road Construction Department, Government of
Bihar, Patna.
4. The Superintending Engineer, Central Road Circle, Road Construction
Department, District Patna, Bihar.
5. The Executive Engineer, Road Division, Bihar Sharif, District Nalanda,
Bihar.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Advocate General
Mr. Mohit Agarwal, AC to AG
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN KUMAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH)
4 06-07-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
present writ application has become infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the present application stands
disposed of as having become infructuous.
3. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
( Ranjan Kumar Jha, J)
rishabh/rajesh
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.