Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
30 judgments · newest first · showing 1–30
The petitioners Sukhachari, Yasin, and Vijaykumar filed writ petitions challenging the non‑payment of advanced or additional increments under the Government Resolution dated 31 October 1989. They relied on a precedent order dated 19 September 2022 in Writ Petition No. 3938 of 2021, seeking similar …
The petitioners Sukhachari, Yasin, and Vijaykumar filed writ petitions challenging the non‑payment of advanced or additional increments under the Government Resolution dated 31 October 1989. They relied on a precedent order dated 19 September 2022 in Writ Petition No. 3938 of 2021, seeking similar …
The petitioner admitted that his residential building was constructed without approved plans or building permission, rendering it illegal. He offered to deposit Rs.1,36,519 with the Barshi Municipal Council within 15 days and sought an expedited decision on his regularisation application (pages …
The petitioner, Varsharani Sanjay Charate, sought the court's intervention to compel the municipal corporation to investigate a tin enclosure with a high roof erected on her land, the ownership of which is unknown. She alleged that the structure is being used as a garage for unlawful activities …
The petitioner, Prakash Vishwanath Sarde, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.8 to forward his Last Pay Certificate and service book to Respondent No.7, and also sought disciplinary action against Respondent No.8 for allegedly refusing to do so. Respondent No.8 countered …
The petitioners, who retired on 30 June of various years, sought a notional addition of the annual increment that became payable on 1 July, arguing that it should be counted for pension, gratuity and other benefits. The Court relied on its earlier order in Prakash Tulshiram Chaudhari v. State of …
The petitioners sought judicial intervention regarding a proposal for the appointment of the first petitioner, which had been pending since September 2013. The court noted that while exemplary costs could be imposed for the delay, the passage of 13 years and possible superannuation or transfer of …
The petitioners, M/s. Chaitanya Industries and others, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against an order passed by the District Magistrate under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, which they had also challenged before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. They later expressed a …
The petitioners, including Sudarshan Narayan Sawant, sought the formalization of a seniority list for Zilla Parishad employees, alleging procedural lapses. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and related officials, relied on a Government Resolution dated 1 February 2023 to argue that the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing Respondents No.4 and 5 to decide a representation dated 08‑06‑2026. The petitioner argued that the court should consider the prayer clause (ii) to compel the respondents to act. Respondents No.4 and 5 contended that …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing Respondents No.4 and No.5 to decide pending representations filed by the petitioners. The petitioners argued that the authorities had failed to act on their representations and requested the court to intervene. The …
The petitioners, Walchand College of Engineering and others, filed a writ petition challenging a Government Resolution dated 10 July 2026. The resolution required compliance with clauses (6) and (8) by 14 July 2026, and the State later extended the deadline to 15 July 2026. The petitioners indicated …
The petitioner, Dr. Mahadev Annappa Shinde, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Shivaji University and other respondents to consider and decide a legal notice dated 06-05-2025. The petitioner specifically requested that the university pass a reasoned order within 30 days, and if an …
The petitioners, members of Chandresh Terrace Co‑operative Housing Society, challenged a notice declaring their building dangerous and ordering its demolition, seeking to halt the redevelopment planned by a developer. They relied on a structural audit report classifying the building as requiring …
M/s. Prabhat Medical Stores filed a writ petition challenging its delay in filing a statutory appeal against an order dated 24-04-2026, which became effective on 01-08-2026. The petitioner filed the appeal only on 10-07-2026, after the 90‑day period, and was criticised for wasting time despite a …
The Maharashtra State Judges Association filed a writ petition seeking leave, traveling allowances and leave travel concessions for its member judicial officers. The State of Maharashtra responded that these benefits had already been granted under a Government Resolution dated 6 February 2024. The …
The petitioner, Mahfooz Islam Mohammad Khan, filed a criminal writ petition in the Bombay High Court. No representative appeared for the petitioner either in person or via video conference. The Court had previously ordered that any objections be removed by 24 June 2026, failing which the petition …
Ms. Sujata Sidramappa Angadi filed a public interest litigation alleging that educational hostels run by her clients are not child care institutions under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 because they lack children in need of care and protection. The Court expressed …
Ekveera Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the levy of an additional lease premium by CIDCO and other respondents. The petitioner later moved a praecipe seeking withdrawal of the petition, stating an intention to pursue a separate remedy …
The petitioner, Manohar Jagannath Jadhav, filed a criminal writ petition alleging an offence under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, but the complaint did not contain any utterances that would attract the Act. The petitioner’s counsel later expressed …
The petitioner, Dr. Mandar Madhukar Patole, sought the registration of an FIR in a domestic dispute with his wife, who is the respondent. Multiple family and domestic violence cases are pending in various courts. The High Court expressed disinclination to order FIR registration and directed the …
The petitioner, Dilip Madhukar Bhurke, filed a writ petition challenging the Thane Municipal Corporation's refusal to allocate a flat that is the subject of a dispute between two private individuals. The corporation argued that, because the ownership of the flat is contested, it cannot hand over …
The petitioner, Shri Bhulabhai Nensi Patel, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel filed a praecipe on 1 July 2026 requesting withdrawal of the petition. The court noted the withdrawal request and, on 2 July 2026, ordered the petition to be disposed of as …
The Union of India filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against Basantabai, seeking relief. The petitioner submitted a photocopy of an order from the competent authority indicating that the Armed Forces Tribunal's order dated 19 October 2022, in Original Application No.23 of 2020, had …
Petitioner Prashant S. Kokane applied for a certificate to appear in person and sought preservation of CCTV footage of an incident dated 17-20 March 2025. The petitioner also filed an interim application (No. 1946 of 2026) requesting the same preservation. The Court noted that the petitioner had …
Petitioner Mohammed Salim Shaikh filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order related to FIR No. 0490 of 2023. The petition was listed for hearing on 22 June 2026, but the petitioner did not appear in person or via video conference. The Respondents, represented by APP Mr. Ajay S. Patil and …
Petitioner Chetan Ramesh Gomta filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an FIR. The petitioner, through counsel, later informed the court that the FIR had already been registered and that he wished to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for the State opposed no point. …
M/s. Perfect Enterprise & Anr. filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners, through counsel, later filed a praecipe on 12 June 2026 indicating their desire to withdraw the petition. The court considered the …
The petitioner, Liladhar Manikrao Duphare, filed a writ petition seeking the High Court to execute an order dated 6 January 2025 passed by the 6th Joint Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC, Belapur. The issue before the Court was whether a writ petition is the appropriate remedy for enforcing that …
Both criminal writ petitions (WP No. 2287 of 2026 and WP No. 2288 of 2026) were filed by the petitioners against the Intelligence Officer, Central Intelligence Unit, Mumbai. The petitioners, through their counsel, informed the Court that the purpose of filing the petitions had been achieved. …
