Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Lakshmeshwar TiwaryversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

Permission to approach an appropriate remedy was granted.

Summary

Lakshmeshwar Tiwary filed a petition before the Patna High Court seeking permission to pursue an appropriate legal remedy after his representation for 10% interest and compensation was rejected by the State authorities. The petitioner argued that the rejection warranted further legal action. The court examined the petition and, without detailed reasoning, granted the requested permission. Consequently, the petition was disposed with the grant of permission. No other reliefs were ordered.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to permission to approach an appropriate remedy after the rejection of his representation for interest and compensation

Subjects

  • interest
  • compensation
  • representation
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • permission to appeal
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17027 of 2025
                  ======================================================
                  Lakshmeshwar Tiwary Son of Late Ram Bhola Tiwary, Resident of village-
                  Bhedhary, P.O. and P.S.- Saharsa, District- Saharsa. At present residing at
                  House No. 237/9, New Colony, Ward No. 9, P.O. and P.S.- Saharsa, District-
                  Saharsa.
                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
            1.     The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, General Administration
                   Department, Bihar, Patna.
            2.    The Collector, Saharsa.
            3.    The Deputy Collector (Establishment), Saharsa.
            4.    The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Saharsa.
            5.     The Block Development Officer, Mahishi, District- Saharsa.
                                                                          ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr.Ashok Kumar Garg
                  For the Respondent/s   :       Mr.Government Pleader (27)
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    30-04-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                2 Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that

                    on adjudication of the representation with regard to 10% interest

                    and compensation, the same has been rejected and for this he

                    may be granted permission for taking appropriate remedy in

                    law.

                                3 Permission is granted.

                                4 This application stands disposed of.



                                               (Ajit Kumar, J)
M.E.H./-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.