Patna High Court
Amar Kant ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- AJIT KUMAR
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Amar Kant Chaudhary filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and several officials of the Department of Education and the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner claimed that his grievance had been satisfactorily redressed. He consequently moved the court seeking to withdraw the writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no longer any cause of action to continue the proceedings. The court, after hearing the counsel, allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were adjudicated.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can be withdrawn by the petitioner after the grievance has been redressed
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- civil procedure
- Patna High Court
- grievance redressed
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18050 of 2025
======================================================
Amar Kant Chaudhary Son of Late Bechan Chaudhary, Resident of Mohalla-
Rajeev Nagar, Road, No.-14 (B), P.O- Kesari Nagar, P.S.- Rajeev Nagar,
District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Department of Education
Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education Government of Bihar,
Patna.
3. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Accountant General of Bihar, Patna.
5. The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna.
6. The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prafull Chandra Thakur
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Standing Counsel (11)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
3 30-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2 Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that
during pendency of this writ petition, the grievance of the
petitioner has been redressed and he prays to withdraw this writ
petition.
3 Prayer is allowed.
4 This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ajit Kumar, J)
M.E.H./-
U
Checking your session…