Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Soma GhoshversusThe Union of India

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as the CAT order has attained finality and the petitioner may seek remedy in the appropriate forum.

Summary

Soma Ghosh, an Assistant Commissioner in Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS), applied for a Deputy Commissioner post through a direct recruitment advertisement in December 2022 but was not selected. Another candidate, T. Pritam Singh, was selected but could not be appointed due to lack of required experience, leading him to file an application before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Patna Bench. The CAT ordered KVS to appoint Ghosh to the post based on the selection panel dated 22‑03‑2023. KVS challenged this order in the Delhi High Court, which dismissed the challenge and upheld the CAT’s decision. Ghosh then filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court contending that the CAT order had attained finality and seeking liberty to approach another forum for redress. The Patna High Court held that the petition was not maintainable as the matter was already decided and that Ghosh could pursue the appropriate remedy in a competent court, thereby disposing of the writ petition.

Issues considered

  • The writ petition is maintainable when the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal has attained finality.
  • Whether the petitioner should be granted liberty to approach another court for redress.
  • The jurisdiction of the High Court to interfere with a CAT order upheld by the Delhi High Court.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • Central Administrative Tribunal
  • finality of orders
  • appointment
  • Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan
  • administrative law
  • jurisdiction
  • liberty

Judgment

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19116 of 2025
     ======================================================
     Soma Ghosh daughter of Sri Santosh Kumar Ghosh, resident of Flat No. 303,
     KC Apartments, Aambagan, Sakchi, Jamshedpur, 831001, presently working
     as Assistant Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Regional Office,
     IGH Road, Kadvanthara, Near Rajiv Gandhi Indoor Stadium, Ernakulam,
     Kerala-682020.

                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                    Versus
1.   The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Education, 122-C,
     Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi-110001.
2.   The Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (HQ), 18, Institutional
     Area, Shaheed Jeet Singh Marg, New Delhi-110016.
3.   Joint Commissioner (Admn.), Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (HQ), 18,
     Institutional Area, Shaheed Jeet Singh Marg, New Delhi-110016.
4.   Smt. Preeti Saxena, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Regional Office,
     Chandigarh, SCO 72-73, Sector 31-A, Dakshin Marg, Chandigarh-160030.
5.   Smt. Sukriti Raiwani, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Dehradun Region,
     Salawala, Hathibarkala, Dehradun, Uttarakhand.
6.   Santhosh Kr N, Deputy Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan,
     Regional Office, IGH Road, Kadvanthara, Near Rajiv Gandhi Indoor
     Stadium, Ernakulam, Kerala-682020.
7.   Dr. Ajay Kumar Mishra, Deputy Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya
     Sangathan, Regional Office, DLW Kanchanpur, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh-
     221004.
8.   Mr. Anurag Bhatnagar, Deputy Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya
     Sangathan, Regional Office, Kankarbagh, Patna, 800020, presently working
     as Deputy Commissioner (Estt-1) and Public Information Officer, KVS
     (HQ), New Delhi.
9.   Mr. T. Pritam Singh @ Pritam Singh, Deputy Commissioner, Kendriya
     Vidyalaya Sangathan, Regional Office, Tinsukia, Campus Kendriya
     Vidyalaya Tinsukia, Raja Ali Road, Nau-Pukhri, Tinsukia-786125.
10. Mr. P. Lyadurai Raja, Deputy Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya
    Sangathan, Regional Office, Near Lions Eye Hospital, Captain N.M. Gupta
    Sarani, Silchar-788001.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr. Abhay Shankar Singh, Advocate
                                  Mr. Rakesh Mohan Singh, Advocate
     For the UoI            :     Mr. Aarsh Kumar, CGC
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
             and
             HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
         Patna High Court CWJC No.19116 of 2025(4) dt.24-02-2026
                                                     2/4




                                                  ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)

4   24-02-2026                   The present writ petition has been filed against the

                   order dated 02.07.2025 passed by the learned Central

                   Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna (hereinafter

                   referred to as “the learned CAT”) in O.A./050/00661/2023

                   whereby and whereunder the original application filed by the

                   petitioner herein has been dismissed in view of the fact that the

                   issue under consideration has already attained finality, hence the

                   learned CAT has thought it proper not to interfere with the final

                   result/panel dated 22.03.2023.

                               2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

                   that the applicant who is an employee of Kendriya Vidyalaya

                   Sangathan was initially appointed as a post graduate teacher and

                   at the relevant time she was working as Assistant Commissioner

                   in Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Regional office, Kankarbagh,

                   Patna. In the month of December, 2022 an advertisement was

                   issued by the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan for appointment of

                   seven Deputy Commissioner by way of direct recruitment, in

                   response whereof the petitioner had also applied, whereafter she

                   had appeared in the interview held by the Kendriya Vidyalaya

                   Sangathan, however her name did not find place in the list of

                   selected candidates. In the meantime one of the candidates Mr.
Patna High Court CWJC No.19116 of 2025(4) dt.24-02-2026
                                            3/4




          T. Pritam Singh @ Pritam Singh (Respondent No. 9) whose

          name had though appeared in the list of selected candidates,

          could not be finally appointed by the Kendriya Vidyalaya

          Sangathan on account of him not fulfilling the eligibility of one

          year experience as Assistant Commissioner. Being aggrieved,

          the Respondent No. 9 had moved the learned CAT, Principal

          Bench, New Delhi by filing O.A. No. 718 of 2024 and the

          learned CAT by a judgment dated 22.07.2024 has held as

          follows:-

                                    25. We thus find merit in the
                          Application. We accordingly allow the
                          application and direct respondent no. 2 (KVS)
                          to consider and appoint the applicant to the
                          post of Deputy Commissioner on the basis of
                          selection notified vide select panel 22.03.2023
                          with consequential benefits. This entire exercise
                          shall be completed within a period of four
                          weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this
                          order. No costs.

                      3. The Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan had challenged

          the aforesaid judgment dated 22.07.2024, passed by the learned

          CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi before the High Court of

          Delhi at New Delhi by filing a writ petition bearing WP(C) No.

          16944/2025, however the learned Division Bench of the High

          Court of Delhi at New Delhi vide judgment dated 09.12.2024

          had dismissed the said writ petition by holding that there is no
         Patna High Court CWJC No.19116 of 2025(4) dt.24-02-2026
                                                     4/4




                   reason to interfere with the impugned judgment passed by

                   learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New

                   Delhi dated 22.07.2024, which is upheld in its entirety.

                               4. In view of the aforesaid sequence of events, the

                   learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that liberty be

                   granted to the petitioner to enable her to avail such remedies as

                   are otherwise available under the law by approaching

                   appropriate Court of law/Forum(s) at New Delhi.

                               5. We find that in case it is permissible under the law

                   for the petitioner to avail suitable remedies by approaching a

                   competent Court of law/Forum(s) for redressal of her grievance,

                   no liberty is required.

                               6. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands

                   disposed of, nonetheless while granting the aforesaid liberty, as

                   sought for by the petitioner.



                                          (Mohit Kumar Shah, J)


                                           (Alok Kumar Pandey, J)
alok/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.