Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Manju SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed and the petition disposed of.

Summary

Manju Singh filed a writ petition seeking to set aside an order dated 31.05.2025 passed by the Additional District Magistrate, Aurangabad, which had partly confirmed a 2018 order granting her a one‑third share of land under Schedule‑VIII. She also requested cancellation of Jamabandi entries in the names of respondent No.7 and creation of new Jamabandi in her name, based on a decree dated 31.07.2022, and directed the authorities to pay compensation. The petition was heard before Justice Purnendu Singh. The court granted permission to approach the appropriate authority and subsequently disposed of the writ petition and any interlocutory applications. No substantive relief was granted to the petitioner.

Issues considered

  • Whether the order dated 31.05.2025 of the Additional District Magistrate can be set aside.
  • Whether the Jamabandi entries in the names of respondent No.7 can be cancelled and re‑entered in the petitioner’s name.
  • Whether the authorities can be directed to pay compensation to the petitioner.

Subjects

  • Land Reform
  • Jamabandi
  • Civil Writ Jurisdiction
  • Compensation
  • Schedule‑VIII
  • District Magistrate
  • Writ of Mandamus

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20089 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Manju Singh W/o Arbind Kishore Singh @ Arvind Singh, D/o Late Lalsharan
                 Singh, R/o Village-Poiwan, P.S.-Muffasil, District-Aurangabad. At present
                 R/o Veena Bihar Apartment, Block-C.F. No. 206, Niti Bagh, Rukunpura, P.S.
                 Rupaspur, District-Patna.
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar .
           2.    The District Magistrate cum Collector, Aurangabad.
           3.    The Additional District Magistrate, Aurangabad.
           4.    The Deputy Collector of Land Reforms (DCLR), Aurangabad.
           5.    The District Registrar, Aurangabad.
           6.    The Circle Officer Sadar, Aurangabad.
           7.     Ravi Kumar Singh, S/o Ram Naresh Singh, R/o Village-Karma Bhagwan,
                  P.S. Aurangabad Muffasil, District-Aurangabad.
                                                                     ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Ms.Mukul Kumari, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :      Mr.S.Raza Ahmad, AAG 5
                                               Mr.Vishwambhar Prasad AC to AAG 5
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER
2   05-01-2026                 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

                               2. The petitioner in paragraph no. 1 of the present writ

                   petition has sought inter alia following relief(s), which is

                   reproduced hereinafter : -

                                           (i) To set aside the order dated 31.05.2025
                                in JBCA-155/2023-24 passed by the learned
                                Additional District Magistrate, Aurangabad whereby
                                and whereunder the learned Addl. District
                                Magistrate, Aurangabad has partly allowed and
                                confirm the order dated 03.10.2018, in T.S No.
                                482/2016, CIS No. 292/2016 passed by the Court of
                                Sub-Judge-1, Aurangabad for Jamabandi with respect
                                to allotted 1/3 part of the land under Schedule-VIII in
                                favour of the petitioner bearing Khata No. 266, Plot
        Patna High Court CWJC No.20089 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026
                                                   2/2




                               No. 194, area 30 decimal, Khata No. 133, Plot No.
                               876, area 02 decimal total area 32 decimal land.

                                         (ii) To cancellation of Jamabandi No. 146
                               and 165 in the name of respondent no. 7 and
                               Jamabandi be created in the name of petitioner
                               whereby and where under the final decreed has
                               already been passed in favour of petitioner vide
                               Judgment dated 31.07.2022 with respect to the land
                               in question, allotted to her, through T.S No. 482 of
                               2016, C.I.S No. 292/2016 passed by the Court of
                               Sub-Judge-1, Aurangabad.

                                         (iii) To issuance of writ in nature of
                               mandamus or any appropriate writ/ Writs, order and
                               direction to direct the respondent authorities to pay
                               the compensation amount to the petitioner.”

                               3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                  petitioner seeks to avail remedy before the appropriate

                  authority/forum against the order dated 31.05.2025 passed in

                  JBCA-155/2023-24            by     the    learned   Additional   District

                  Magistrate, Aurangabad for the relief(s) as prayed for in the

                  present writ petition.

                              4. Permission accorded.

                              5. With the above observation/direction, the present

                  writ petition stands disposed of.

                              6. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, also stands

                  disposed of.


                                            (Purnendu Singh, J)
chn/-
U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.