Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Prof. (Dr.) Surendra Prasad @ Dr. Surendra AnalversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court directed the Registrar of Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University to consider the petitioner’s claim per the One‑Man Committee’s recommendation within six weeks and to grant the benefits if found justified.

Summary

The petitioner, Prof. Surendra Prasad, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Bihar and Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University to recognize his appointment date as 11‑07‑1978 and to pay consequent service benefits and salary arrears. The petition relied on an order dated 18‑03‑2013 which had referred teachers' qualifying service periods to a One‑Man Committee headed by Justice S.N. Jha, whose report (Case No.58, T.M.B.U.) recommended the petitioner’s promotion and benefits. The petitioner argued that the university had not acted on the Committee’s report despite a representation filed on 24‑07‑2025. The university counsel contended that the matter was pending before the Registrar and should be considered in line with the Committee’s recommendations. The Court held that the Registrar must examine the petitioner’s claim in accordance with the Committee’s report within six weeks and, if justified, grant the entitled benefits. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of after the direction was issued.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Registrar of Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University is obligated to act on the One‑Man Committee’s recommendation and grant the petitioner’s service benefits.
  • Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued directing the university and the State to recognize a retrospective appointment date and pay salary arrears.
  • Whether the passage of time bars reconsideration of the petitioner’s appointment date for the purpose of promotion and benefits.

Subjects

  • appointment date
  • service benefits
  • mandamus
  • one‑man committee
  • higher education
  • public service
  • retrospective appointment
  • university staff

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20990 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Prof. (Dr.) Surendra Prasad @ Dr. Surendra Anal Son of Late Satya Narayan
                 Poddar, Resident of Mohalla- Balkrishna Nagar (Surkhikal), Tilkamanjhi,
                 Police Station- Barari, Town and District- Bhagalpur.

                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department,
                 Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Director, Higher Education, Education Department, Government of
                 Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
           3.    The Auditor, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.
           4.    The Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur through its Registrar.
           5.    The Vice Chancellor, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.
           6.    The Registrar, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.
           7.    The Finance Officer, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr. Suman Kumar. Advocate
                 For the T.M.B.U.        :        Mr. Ashhar Mustafa, Advocate
                                                  Ms. Anita Kumari, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s    :        Mr. Government Advocate (5)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-01-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   counsel for the State.

                                 2. The writ petition has been filed for the following

                   reliefs :-

                                          I. For issuance of a writ of mandamus or
                                    any appropriate writ, order or direction
                                    commanding the respondents to consider the date
                                    of petitioner's appointment w.e.f. 11.07.1978 in
Patna High Court CWJC No.20990 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026
                                           2/5




                          place of 01.01.1981 and to pay the consequential
                          service benefits to him as earlier directed by this
                          Hon'ble Court in the light of the findings of one
                          man committee constituted on the direction of this
                          Hon'ble Court.
                                 II. For issuance of a writ of mandamus or
                          any appropriate writ, order or direction
                          commanding the respondents to pay the arrears/
                          difference of salary considering his date of
                          appointment from 11.07.1978.
                                 III. For issuance of a writ order or
                          directions commanding the respondents for grant
                          of any relief or reliefs to which the petitioner may
                          be deemed entitled by this Hon'ble Court.


                      3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          pursuant to the order dated 18.03.2013 passed in a batch of writ

          petitions, that is C.W.J.C. No.10032 of 2009 and analogous

          cases, the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, with consent of the

          parties, had referred the matter of the colleges/universities

          teachers regarding determination of their qualifying period of

          service for the purpose of benefit of increment and promotion

          to One Man Committee headed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.N.Jha,

          by passing the following orders and the relevant portion of the

          said order dated 18.03.2013 is reproduced hereunder :-

                                  “The term of reference of Justice Jha would
                          be for determining the qualifying period of service
                          of each and every teacher on whom notices have
                          been served or action taken in furtherance to the
Patna High Court CWJC No.20990 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026
                                           3/5




                          observation of the High Court in the earlier
                          Orders. It is made clear that no deliberation and
                          exercise would be required to be made on the
                          correctness or otherwise of the appointment or
                          entry into service at the thresh-hold though it will
                          have relevance to the above determination and
                          exercise. The issue of validity of appointments
                          cannot be racked up now after more than two to
                          three decades and there is an inherent presumption
                          with regard to their continuance, taking into
                          consideration the long span of service rendered by
                          them. Justice Jha, however, would be obliged to
                          give a hearing to the petitioners / teachers or their
                          counsels and the university and the State
                          Authorities are also free to assist Justice Jha in
                          resolving an issue which has been pending for
                          many many years due to protracted litigation. The
                          Court leaves it to Justice Jha to make appropriate
                          request or direction for the kind of logistics or
                          support which he requires from the State
                          Government        for    completing   the   task   being
                          conferred upon him by this Court."


                      4. It has next been submitted that One Man

          Committee headed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.N. Jha, has

          considered the case of this petitioner vide Case No.58

          (T.M.B.U.) and found the case of this petitioner for

          consideration of merit promotion and other benefits for which
Patna High Court CWJC No.20990 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026
                                           4/5




          the reference was made and the report which finds favour to this

          petitioner, has been appended as Annexure-P/6, to the writ

          petition.

                      5. From the records, it appears that, the report of One

          Man Committee headed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.N.Jha, which

          was constituted under the orders of this Court, has already been

          tabled for consideration and it would be in fitness of things that

          the concerned authorities should now take a final decision with

          regard to the claim of this petitioner, for which, a detailed

          representation has already been placed before the Registrar,

          T.B.M.U on 24.07.2025, which till date, has not been

          adjudicated.

                      6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the

          University submits that since the report has already been tabled

          and the representation for consideration is pending before the

          Registrar, T.B.M.U. and hence, the matter may be directed for

          appropriate consideration in terms of the report submitted by

          One-Man Committee headed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.N.Jha.

                      7. Considering the submissions of the parties, this

          Court finds it appropriate to direct the Registrar, T.B.M.U., to

          consider the claim of this petitioner for grant of benefits, for

          which this petitioner is entitled, in terms of the recommendation
           Patna High Court CWJC No.20990 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026
                                                      5/5




                     of the One Man Committee headed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice

                     S.N.Jha, within a period of six weeks and if the claim of the

                     petitioner is found justified, then the benefit which accrues to

                     this petitioner shall also be extended in his favour, within the

                     same time.

                                 8. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.



                                                  (Ajit Kumar, J)
sharun/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.