Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Belas Ram @ Vilash RamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
CONSIGNED

Holding

The petition is dismissed as the grievance has been redressed.

Summary

Belas Ram filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of various revenue officials of the State of Bihar. The petitioner alleged a grievance concerning land revenue matters. The State counsel submitted that the petitioner’s grievance had already been redressed. The Court, after hearing both sides, found no merit in continuing the petition. Consequently, the writ petition was consigned to the records, effectively dismissing it.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner’s grievance has been adequately redressed by the State authorities.

Subjects

  • writ jurisdiction
  • land revenue
  • state grievance
  • civil writ

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21066 of 2025
                  ======================================================
                  Belas Ram @ Vilash Ram Son of Late Muneshwar Ram, Resident of Village-
                  Pakariya Tola Kubera, Police Station-Harshiddhi, District-East Champaran
                  (Bihar).

                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
            1.    The State of Bihar, Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land
                  Reform, Bihar, Patna.
            2.    The Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reform, Bihar, Patna.
            3.    The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.
            4.    The District Magistrate cum Collector, East Champaran, Motihari.
            5.    The Additional Collector, East Champaran.
            6.    The Sub-Divisional Officer, Areraj, East Champaran, Motihari.
            7.    The Circle Officer, Harshiddhi, East Champaran.
            8.    The Revenue Officer, Harshiddhi, East Champaran, Motihari.

                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr.Ramakant Yadav, Advocate.
                  For the Respondent/s   :     AC to SC-11.
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    19-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                    petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

                                2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State

                    submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed.

                                3. In view of the above, the writ petition stands

                    consigned to the records.


                                                               (Purnendu Singh, J)
mantreshwar/-
U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.