Patna High Court

Sheo Satya PrakashversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 19 February 2026
Disposal: DISMISSED
Bench: AJIT KUMAR

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn having become infructuous.

Summary

The petitioner, Sheo Satya Prakash, filed a civil writ petition challenging certain actions of the State of Bihar and its education department officials. He later informed the court that his grievances had been satisfactorily redressed and that he no longer wished to pursue the matter. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Brisketu Sharan Pandey, sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition. The court examined the request and found no objection to allowing the withdrawal. Accordingly, the court granted permission to withdraw the writ petition. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn, having become infructuous.

Subjects

withdrawal of petition
writ jurisdiction
civil writ
infructuous

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2136 of 2024
                  ======================================================
                  Sheo Satya Prakash son of Bishnoo Sharan Prasad @ Bishnu Saran Prasad,
                  Resident of Mahadevpuri, East of Marg No. 6/C Gardanibagh, PS-
                  Gardanibagh, District-Patna.                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
             1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of
                   Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
             2.   The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
             3.   The Director Administration cum Additional Secretary, Department of
                  Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
             4.   The Director Higher Education, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar,
                  Patna.
             5.   The Accountant General Bihar.
             6.   Magadh University Bodh Gaya through its Registrar.
             7.   The Registrar, Magadh University, District-Gaya.
                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr. Brisketu Sharan Pandey, Adv.
                  For the Respondent/s   :     Standing Counsel (9)
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                        ORAL ORDER

3   19-02-2026                    Mr. Brisketu Sharan Pandey, learned counsel for the

                    petitioner submits that since the grievances of the petitioner

                    have been redressed, he does not want to pursue the matter any

                    further and seeks permission to withdraw the same.

                                2. Permission stands accorded.

                                3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed

                    as withdrawn having become infructuous.


                                                     (Ajit Kumar, J)
    perwez

U

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…