Patna High Court
Dinesh DinkarversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- AJIT KUMAR
Holding
The court held that it may permit the withdrawal of a pending application when it has become infructuous.
Summary
The petitioner, Dinesh Dinkar, filed a civil writ application before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the application, the petitioner sought the court's permission to withdraw it, claiming that the matter had become infructuous. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted a request for withdrawal. The court considered whether it could grant permission to withdraw a pending application. Finding that the application was indeed infructuous, the court granted the request. Consequently, the application was disposed of as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the court may grant permission to withdraw a pending civil writ application on the ground that it has become infructuous
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- infructuous
- civil writ jurisdiction
- Patna High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22284 of 2018
======================================================
Dinesh Dinkar S/o-Suresh Paswan, Resident of Village-Kaazichak, P.O.-
Ratanpura, P.S.-Ratanpura, District-Munger.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar and Ors
2. The Director Secondary Education Government of Bihar, Budha Marg,
Patna.
3. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Munger Division Munger.
4. The District Education Officer, Munger.
5. Pankaj Ranjan S/o-Uday Shankar Singh, Resident of Village P.O.-Kurkuri,
P.S.-Paliganj, District-Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shyama Kant Singh
For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Shilpa Singh- Ga12
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Jha
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
4 10-03-2026 This case has been listed under the heading ‘To Be
Mentioned’ at the instance of learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
to withdraw this application, submitting that during the pen-
dency of this application it has become infructuous.
3. Permission is granted.
4. Accordingly, this application is disposed of as hav-
ing become infructuous.
(Ajit Kumar, J)
shikha/-
U
Checking your session…