Patna High Court
Manu Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- AJIT KUMAR
Holding
The Court directed the District Magistrate to decide the petitioner’s arms licence application within eight weeks and communicate the order.
Summary
Manu Kumar Singh filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Bihar and its officials to grant him a non‑prohibited bore pistol/revolver license under the Arms Act. He alleged that his application, filed on 27‑01‑2015 with the District Magistrate, Saran, had remained pending without any decision. The State contended that the application was in the prescribed format and the competent authority must adjudicate it according to law. The Court observed that the authority had unreasonably delayed the decision and directed the District Magistrate to pass a final order on the license application within eight weeks and communicate the order to the petitioner. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether the District Magistrate is obligated to decide a pending arms licence application within a reasonable time.
- Whether the High Court can issue a mandatory direction to the authority to grant or reject the licence.
Legislation cited
Subjects
- Arms licence
- Arms Act
- writ petition
- administrative delay
- District Magistrate
- Civil writ jurisdiction
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2293 of 2026
======================================================
Manu Kumar Singh Son of Shree Ashesar Singh, Resident of Village- Nethua,
P.O.- Awari, P.S.- Marhawrah, District- Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.
4. The District Arms Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.
5. The Suprintendent of Police, Saran at Chapra.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dr. Alok Kumar Sinha
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Standing Counsel (7)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 11-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the State.
2. The writ application has been filed seeking a direction
commanding the respondents authorities to grant license of NP
Bore Pistol/Revolver to the petitioner in terms of provisions of
Arms Act and to dispose of the application dated 27.01.2015 filed
by the petitioner which is said to be pending before the Respondent
No.3, the District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an
application in the prescribed format has already been filed before
the District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, which is appended to the
writ application. However, till date, no action has been taken with
regard to the grant of an arms license. It is further submitted that, as
Patna High Court CWJC No.2293 of 2026(2) dt.11-05-2026
2/2
per the provisions of the Arms Act, a license may be granted for
ensuring the safety of life and property upon an application being
made. Despite the application having been filed on 27.01.2015, no
decision has yet been taken.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State
submits that since the application has already been made in the
prescribed format, the competent authority is required to adjudicate
the same by passing an appropriate order in accordance with law.
5. In view of the submissions made on behalf of the
parties, the District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, is directed to take
a final decision on the petitioner’s application for grant of an arms
license within a period of eight weeks from today. The order so
passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner within the said
period.
6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the
instant writ application stands disposed.
(Ajit Kumar, J)
sanjeev/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.