Patna High Court
Dhirendra Kumar ThakurversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- AJIT KUMAR
Holding
The Court held that the District Magistrate must adjudicate the petitioner's claim for an arms licence within four weeks, relying on the threat perception report of the Senior Superintendent of Police.
Summary
Petitioner Dhirendra Kumar Thakur filed a writ petition seeking an arms licence (pistol) on the ground of a threat perception report submitted by the District Arms Magistrate and referred to the Senior Superintendent of Police. The State argued that the report, already placed before the Senior Superintendent, indicated a genuine threat and that the District Magistrate should adjudicate the licence grant in accordance with law. The Court examined the submissions and the annexed reports and found no impediment to the District Magistrate deciding the matter. Accordingly, it directed the District Magistrate of Muzaffarpur to decide the petitioner's claim for an arms licence within four weeks, referencing the relevant annexures. The writ application was thereafter disposed of.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate authority and procedure for granting an arms licence to the petitioner based on the threat perception report?
Subjects
- arms licence
- threat perception
- district magistrate
- Senior Superintendent of Police
- writ jurisdiction
- Arms Act
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2736 of 2025
======================================================
Dhirendra Kumar Thakur Ram Kishore Thakur Resident of Village-
Ratanpura Post- Ramkrishna Dubiyanhi, P.S.-Saraiya (O.P. Jaitpur), District-
Muzaffapur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Govt.
of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Sardar Patel Bhawan, Patna.
4. The District Collector, Muzaffarpur, District-Muzaffarpur.
5. The District Arms Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, District-Muzaffarpur.
6. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur.
7. The Officer Incharge, P.S.-Saraiya (O.P.-Jaitpur), District-Muzaffarpur.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shashi Bhushan Singh
For the Respondent/s : Dr. Md. Raisul Haque, SC-10
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 16-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The present writ application has been filed for
directing the respondents to grant an arms licence (pistol) to the
petitioner, as the query made by respondent no. 6 pursuant to
issuance of Letter No. 801 dated 13.11.2023 has already been
complied with, as would be apparent from the report dated
26.07.2024.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
issue with regard to threat perception to the petitioner was
examined by the District Arms Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, and the
necessary reports have already been referred to the Senior
Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur. It is further submitted that
appropriate directions may be issued to the District Magistrate to
Patna High Court CWJC No.2736 of 2025(2) dt.16-03-2026
2/2
adjudicate the issue pertaining to grant of an arms licence, for
which a representation has also been filed before the District
Magistrate.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State
submits that a report has already been placed for consideration
before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur, which is
appended to the writ application as Annexure-P/5. The said report
indicates that the petitioner has a threat perception and, therefore,
District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, may be directed to adjudicate
the issues of grant of license in accordance with law by looking to
the report of Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur.
5. Considering the submissions of the parties and the
materials available on record, this Court finds it appropriate to
direct the District Magistrate to decide the claim of the petitioner
for grant of an arms licence within a period of four weeks from
today. The necessary order shall be passed with reference to
Annexures-P/4 and P/5.
6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the
instant writ application stands disposed of.
(Ajit Kumar, J)
shikha/-
U
Checking your session…