Patna High Court
Vijay KeshariversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
Holding
In the absence of evidence of regular use for liquor transport, a nominal penalty of Rs 1,000 suffices to secure release of the vehicle.
Summary
The petitioner sought release of his four-wheeler after it was seized by Buxar police for carrying one litre of illicit beer discovered during a vehicle check. The petitioner was not in the car; his brother was driving, and no evidence showed the vehicle was regularly used for liquor transport. The State argued the seizure and confiscation were proper, but the court noted the minimal quantity and lack of prior offenses. Relying on Rule 12A(2) and (4) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules and a prior decision (Rakesh Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar), the court held that imposing a heavy penalty would be unjust. It ordered the petitioner to pay a nominal penalty of Rs 1,000 and submit ownership documents, after which the vehicle would be released. The writ petition was disposed, granting the relief sought.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is liable for the seizure of the vehicle despite not being present at the time of the offence.
- Whether a penalty of Rs 1,000 is appropriate under Rule 12A considering the quantity of illicit liquor recovered.
- Whether the vehicle should be released pending payment of the penalty under the extraordinary jurisdiction of Article 226.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (as amended) — s. 57B, 58, 92, 93
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 and 2022 — s. 30(a), 37
Subjects
- vehicle seizure
- illicit liquor
- penalty
- writ petition
- Article 226
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- release of vehicle
- proportionality
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2791 of 2026
======================================================
Vijay Keshari S/o Lal Chand Keshari, R/o Vill.- House No. K-21/40, Gali
No.-2, Gautam Vihar, Seelampur, P.S.- Seelampur, Dist.- North East Delhi,
Delhi.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Excise and Prohibition
Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Director General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Excise Commissioner of Bihar, Patna.
4. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Buxar.
5. The Superintendent of Police, Buxar.
6. The Superintendent of Excise, Buxar.
7. The S.H.O. Buxar Excise Police Station, Dist.- Buxar.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Kamal Deo Sharma, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sarvesh Kumar, GP-24
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)
Date: 23-03-2026
The present writ petition has been filed for release of
four-wheeler Baleno vehicle of the petitioner bearing
Registration No. DL-10CK-1123, Chassis No. MBHEWB
22SHL186640 and Engine No. K12MN7154888 in favour of
the petitioner.
Patna High Court CWJC No.2791 of 2026 dt.23-03-2026
2/6
2. The brief facts of the case are that the police personnel
and excise officials, belonging to Chausa Janch Chauki, Buxar
were checking vehicles coming from Uttar Pradesh in the
afternoon of 03.12.2025 and at about 9.25 pm, one Baleno car
bearing Registration No. DL-10CK-1123 was coming from the
side of Uttar Pradesh, which was stopped and search was made,
leading to recovery of one liter of illicit beer. In the said car,
four persons including the brother of the petitioner was sitting,
however the petitioner was not present in the car. The vehicle
and the illicit beer were seized by the police personnel, leading
to registration of Buxar Excise P.S. Case No. 499 of 2025, dated
03.12.2025 under Section 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition
and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 and 2022, against the said
four persons.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that meager
quantity of one liter of illicit beer has been recovered from the
vehicle in question as also the petitioner was not present in the
said car and the same was being driven by the brother of the
petitioner, hence the petitioner is not having any complicity in
the matter, thus a lenient view be taken and the vehicle in
question be released upon payment of reasonable penalty.
4. Per contra, the learned counsel for the Respondent-State
Patna High Court CWJC No.2791 of 2026 dt.23-03-2026
3/6
submits that since illicit beer has been recovered from the car in
question, the same has been seized and the FIR has been lodged
as also confiscation proceeding has been initiated, however the
learned counsel for the Respondent-State has not denied the fact
that meager quantity, i.e. one liter of illicit beer has been
recovered from the car in question and there is no material,
which has been brought on record in the counter affidavit, filed
by the Respondent-State to show that either the vehicle in
question was being regularly used for transporting illicit liquor
or the petitioner is an accused in such similar type of cases.
5. A bare perusal of Rule 12A (2) of the Rules, 2023 would
show that while imposing penalty, the quantity of intoxicant
recovered is also required to be considered. Nonetheless, at this
juncture we would like to refer to an order dated 26.11.2025,
passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court in CWJC No.14928
of 2025 (Rakesh Kumar Singh vs. the State of Bihar & Ors),
wherein it has been held as under:-
"In absence of any specific ground that the vehicle was in
regular use for transportation of liquors or that the
owner of the vehicle was found involved in transportation
of the liquors and/or there are multiple cases of similar
nature against the owner or the vehicle, imposition of the
penalty to the extent of 75 per cent of the insured value is
Patna High Court CWJC No.2791 of 2026 dt.23-03-2026
4/6
an onerous condition and it amounts to virtually creating
a situation where huge hardship may be caused to an
owner of the vehicle in getting release of the vehicle."
6. Yet another aspect of the matter is that Rule 12A (4) of
the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Rules, 2022
provides that while imposing fine, the Collector or the officer
authorized by him shall have due regard to the economic status
of the individual, nature of his involvement in the crime and the
quantum of intoxicant recovered.
7 Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case
as also taking into account the fact that meager quantity of one
litre of illicit beer has been recovered, the petitioner was not
present in the car at the time the aforesaid incident had taken
place and no material is available in the counter affidavit filed
by the respondents to show that either the petitioner/his vehicle
was regularly involved in transportation of illicit liquor or the
petitioner is involved in multiple cases of similar nature, which
are also the factors required to be considered while imposing
penalty for release of the vehicle, as has been provided under
Rule 12A(2) of the Rules, 2023 and Rule 12A(4) of the Rules,
2022, we are of the considered view that it would be in the
interest of justice and equitable, if the petitioner is directed to
pay a sum of Rs.1,000/- by way of penalty for the purposes of
Patna High Court CWJC No.2791 of 2026 dt.23-03-2026
5/6
release of the vehicle in question.
8. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that the petitioner would be depositing a sum of Rs.
1,000/- within a period of three weeks from today and shall
make available the documents of ownership of the vehicle in
question before the competent authority.
9. In such view of the matter, we direct that in case the
aforesaid sum of Rs. 1,000/- is deposited before the competent
authority within a period of three weeks from today, the vehicle
in question shall be released in favour of the petitioner, after
being satisfied with the documents relating to the ownership of
the vehicle in question, within a period of one week, thereafter.
10. It is needless to state that the present order has been
passed by us while invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the reason that
unnecessarily the petitioner shall be liable to be subjected to
various proceedings like the one under Rule 12A of the Rules,
2023, Section 57B, 58, 92 and 93 of the Bihar Prohibition and
Excise Act, 2016, as amended upto date, for a meager recovery
of one litre illicit beer, as also with a view to avoid and prevent
multiplicity of proceedings, in the interest of justice.
11. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off
Patna High Court CWJC No.2791 of 2026 dt.23-03-2026
6/6
on the aforesaid terms.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)
Ajay/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR
CAV DATE NA
Uploading Date 25.03.2026
Transmission Date NA
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.