Patna High Court
Punam KumariversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- A ABHISHEK REDDY
Holding
The writ petition is not maintainable because the petitioner can avail the specific remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.
Summary
Petitioner Punam Kumari filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act. The petitioner sought relief from the High Court, alleging violation of her rights. The Court observed that the petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy by filing an application under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. Since this specific statutory remedy is available, the Court held that the writ petition is not maintainable. Consequently, the petition was disposed, with the Court directing the petitioner to pursue the remedy available under the SARFAESI Act.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition is maintainable when an alternative remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act is available.
- Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition in the present circumstances.
Legislation cited
Subjects
- SARFAESI Act
- Section 13(2)
- Section 17
- Debt Recovery Tribunal
- writ jurisdiction
- alternative remedy
- Civil writ petition
- High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4249 of 2026
======================================================
Punam Kumari Wife of Prem Kumar Sinha, Resident of 145, Bhikhachak,
Post and Police Station- Gardanibagh, District- Patna (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Ministry of Finance,
Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Chief Manager-cum-Authorized Officer, Loan Against Property-
Business Division, Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company
Limited, Ahuwaliya Building, new Dakbanglow Road behind LIC Off.
Patna.
3. The Regional Manager, Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company
Limited, Bihar, Patna.
4. The Branch Manager, Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company
Limited, Branch-Patna(Bihar).
5. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Patna.
6. The Registrar, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ankit Kumar Singh
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Standing Counsel (04)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
ORAL ORDER
2 01-04-2026 Having regard to the fact that the petitioner is having
an alternative and efficacious remedy of approaching the Debt
Recovery Tribunal, Patna by way of an application, under
Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, against the notice, under
Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, issued by the Respondent-
Finance Company, this Court is not inclined to entertain the
present writ petition.
Patna High Court CWJC No.4249 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026
2/2
2. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of
granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedies as
available under law.
(A. Abhishek Reddy , J)
Bhardwaj/-
U
Checking your session…