Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Naresh Prasad SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
CONSIGNED

Holding

The petition is dismissed as the grievance has been redressed.

Summary

Naresh Prasad Singh filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and several officials, presumably relating to land and revenue matters. The petitioner sought relief through the writ jurisdiction, alleging that his grievance had not been addressed. The respondents, representing various government departments and officials, opposed the petition. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel submitted that the grievance had already been redressed. The court, noting this submission, found no ground to entertain the writ and consequently consigned the petition. The writ petition was therefore dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner’s grievance has been redressed
  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on that basis

Subjects

  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • land reforms
  • petition dismissed
  • grievance redressed

Judgment

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.514 of 2026
     ======================================================
     Naresh Prasad Singh Son of Jagdev Prasad Singh, Resident of Matri Chhaya
     Kali Mandir Road, Ward No. 16, Mera Arya Navyuvak Pustakalya, Village-
     Dhutauli Malpa, P.S.- Chautham, District- Khagaria, Bihar-851201.

                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                     Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of
     Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.   The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms,
     Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.   The Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of
     Bihar, Patna.
4.   The Commissioner, Munger Division, Munger.
5.   The Collector, Khagaria.
6.   The Additional Collector, Khagaria.
7.   The Circle Officer, Circle Chautham, District- Khagaria.
8.   Ram Pravesh Kumar, Son of Vimal Mandal, Resident of Matri Chhaya Kali
     Mandir Road, Ward No. 16 Mera Arya Navyuvak Pustakalya, Village-
     Dhutauli Malpa, P.S.- Chautham, District Khagaria, Bihar 851201.
9.   Manoj Prasad, Son of Vimal Mandal, Resident of Village-Dhutauli Malpa,
     P.S.- Chautham, District- Khagaria, Bihar-851201.
10. Rakesh Prasad, Son of Ramchandra Mandal, Resident of Village-Dhutauli
    Malpa, P.S.- Chautham, District- Khagaria, Bihar-851201.
11. Tuntun Kumar, Son of Ramchandra Mandal, Resident of Village-Dhutauli
    Malpa, P.S.-Chautham, District- Khagaria, Bihar-851201.
12. Rajesh Kumar, Son of Dayanand Mandal, Resident of Village-Dhutauli
    Malpa, P.S.-Chautham, District- Khagaria, Bihar-851201.
13. Jayjay Ram, Son of Chadhuri Mandal, Resident of Village-Dhutauli Malpa,
    P.S.- Chautham, District- Khagaria, Bihar-851201.
14. Hareram Prasad, Son of Chadhuri Mandal, Resident of Village-Dhutauli
    Malpa, P.S.- Chautham, District- Khagaria, Bihar-851201.
15. Mayaram Prasad, Son of Chadhuri Mandal, Resident of Village-Dhutauli
    Malpa, P.S.- Chautham, District- Khagaria, Bihar-851201.
16. Ramkirshna Prasad, Son of Chadhuri Mandal, Resident of Village-Dhutauli
    Malpa, P.S.- Chautham, District- Khagaria, Bihar-851201.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Kumar Kaushik, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Kumar Alok, SC 7
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
           Patna High Court CWJC No.514 of 2026(2) dt.27-01-2026
                                                       2/2




                                                    ORAL ORDER

2    27-01-2026                       Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                     petitioner submitted that the grievance of the petitioner has been

                     redressed.

                                  2. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands

                     consigned.



                                               (Purnendu Singh, J)
Sanjay/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.