Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Surendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court directed that the State obtain a decision under Section 6(1) of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 to allow the petitioners to file an encroachment appeal, and that the status quo be maintained pending that appeal.

Summary

The petitioners, a group of Yadav family members, filed a writ petition seeking a restraining order against the demolition of their house situated on raiyati land in Rampur Nagwan, Patna. The demolition order was issued by the Circle Officer, Paliganj, without complying with the procedural requirements of the Land Acquisition Act. The High Court held that the State must direct the Circle Officer to issue a decision under Section 6(1) of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956, enabling the petitioners to file an encroachment appeal before the Collector. The Court directed that the petitioners file such appeal within two weeks, and that the status quo be maintained pending adjudication of the appeal. Accordingly, the writ application was disposed with these directions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the demolition of the petitioners' house can be effected without compliance with the Land Acquisition Act.
  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to a status quo pending filing of an encroachment appeal under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956.
  • Whether the Circle Officer's demolition order is valid in the absence of a decision under Section 6(1) of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • land acquisition
  • encroachment
  • rai yati land
  • demolition
  • status quo
  • public land encroachment act
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • Bihar

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7842 of 2026
                 ======================================================
           1.     Surendra Kumar Son of Damodar Yadav, Resident of Village- Rampur
                  Nagawan, P.S.- Paliganj, Circle- Paliganj, District- Patna (Bihar).
           2.    Saheb Yadav, Son of Vasdeo Yadav, Resident of Village- Rampur Nagawan,
                 P.S.- Paliganj, Circle- Paliganj, District- Patna (Bihar).
           3.    Mahesh Yadav, Son of Late Bachu Yadav, Resident of Village- Rampur
                 Nagawan, P.S.- Paliganj, Circle- Paliganj, District- Patna (Bihar).
           4.    Madhav Yadav, Son of Late Bachu Yadav, Resident of Village- Rampur
                 Nagawan, P.S.- Paliganj, Circle- Paliganj, District- Patna (Bihar).
           5.    Subodh Kumar, Son of Suresh Yadav, Resident of Village- Rampur
                 Nagawan, P.S.- Paliganj, Circle- Paliganj, District- Patna (Bihar).
           6.    Ram Badan Yadav, Son of Brija Yadav, Resident of Village- Rampur
                 Nagawan, P.S.- Paliganj, Circle- Paliganj, District- Patna (Bihar).
                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue
                 Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna.
           4.    The Collector, District- Patna.
           5.    The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Paliganj, Patna.
           6.    The Sub-Divisional Officer, Paliganj, Patna.
           7.    The Sub-Division Police Officer, Paliganj, Patna.
           8.    The Circle Officer, Circle- Paliganj, District- Patna.
                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :          Mr.Shailendra Kumar
                 For the Respondent/s   :          Mr.Standing Counsel (12)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-05-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned counsel for the respondents.

                               2. The instant writ application has been filed seeking

                   restraint upon the respondents from demolishing the house of

                   the petitioners, for which the Circle Officer, Paliganj, Patna

                   issued letter dated 09.05.2026 (Annexure-P/8 series). The land

                   in question is raiyati land standing in the name of the ancestors
           Patna High Court CWJC No.7842 of 2026(2) dt.15-05-2026
                                                       2/2




                     of the petitioners, situated at Mauza–Rampur Nagwan, Thana

                     No. 352, Tauzi No. 14579, Khata No. 438, Khesra Nos. 208 and

                     743, and that the action has been initiated without following the

                     provisions of the Land Acquisition Act and without proper

                     consideration of the relevant documents.

                                 3. The respondent-State is directed to instruct the

                     Circle Officer, Paliganj, Patna to provide the decision taken

                     under Section 6(1) of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act,

                     1956 to enable the petitioners to file an encroachment appeal

                     before the Collector, Patna in accordance with the provisions of

                     the Land Acquisition Act.

                                 4. It is made clear that once such appeal is filed within

                     a period of two weeks from today, status quo shall be

                     maintained till adjudication of the said appeal and further action

                     shall be taken in terms of the order passed in the encroachment

                     appeal.

                                 5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the

                     writ application stands disposed.



                                                              (Ajit Kumar, J)
shikha/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.