Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Urmila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The bank must unlock the petitioner's premises within ten days of the order.

Summary

Petitioner Urmila Devi filed a writ petition seeking relief after the Central Bank of India initiated SARFAESI proceedings against her premises. The bank later decided to withdraw those proceedings and requested the court to order the unlocking of the premises. The court considered the bank's submission and the petitioner's request for relief. It directed the bank to unlock the premises within ten days of the order. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Central Bank of India is obligated to unlock the petitioner's premises upon withdrawal of SARFAESI proceedings

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • SARFAESI
  • bank
  • writ petition
  • unlock premises
  • Civil writ jurisdiction
  • Patna High Court

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7987 of 2026
                 ======================================================
                 Urmila Devi W/o Late Zapasi Mahto r/o Vill Pachpakari P.S. Dhaka Dist. East
                 Champaran.

                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Govt. of Bihar at Patna.
           2.    The District Magistrate Motihari East Champaran at Motihari.
           3.    The Circle Officer Dhaka Block East Champaran.
           4.    The Police Superintendent East Champaran.
           5.    The S.H.O Dhaka P.S. East Champaran.
           6.    The Manger Central Bank of India Devapur Branch Block East Champaran.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr.Dhannjay Kumar No 2, Advocate.
                 For the Respondent/s   :      Mr.Addl. Advocate General (04)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   01-07-2026                 Learned counsel         appearing on behalf            of   the

                   Respondent-Central Bank of India, on written instructions,

                   submits that the bank had decided to withdraw the SARFAESI

                   proceedings against the petitioner herein and consequential to

                   the withdrawal of the said proceedings, the Respondent-Bank

                   will unlock the premises of the petitioner which is subject

                   matter of the present writ petition.

                               2. Having regard to the above made submissions, the

                   present writ petition is disposed of directing the Respondent-

                   Bank to unlock the premises of the petitioner at the earliest

                   preferably within a period of 10 days from the date of the
           Patna High Court CWJC No.7987 of 2026(4) dt.01-07-2026
                                                       2/2




                     receipt of the copy of this order.

                                 3. With the above directions, the present writ petition

                     stands disposed of.



                                                         (A. Abhishek Reddy, J)
shakir/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.