Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nirmal PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
CONSIGNED

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as the petitioners' grievance had already been redressed by payment of compensation.

Summary

The petitioners, sons of the late Chandrika Prasad and Prasuram Prasad, filed a writ petition against the State of Bihar, Bihar Rajya Pool Nirman Nigam Ltd, the Collector of Siwan, the Land Acquisition Officer, and the Senior Project Engineer, seeking relief presumably related to land acquisition compensation. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the compensation had already been paid and that their grievance was fully redressed. The respondents' counsel appeared but no further argument was recorded. The court, after hearing the parties, accepted the submission that the matter was settled. Consequently, the writ petition was consigned, effectively dismissing it. The order was delivered by Justice Purnendu Singh on 13‑01‑2026.

Subjects

  • land acquisition
  • compensation
  • writ petition
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.820 of 2021
                  ======================================================
            1.     Nirmal Prasad
            2.    Krishna Prasad
            3.    Sunil Kumar Prasad
                  All three sons of Late Chandrika Prasad
            4.    Vinod Kumar Prasad
            5.    Munna Kumar
            6.    Mantu Kumar
                  All three sons of Late Prasuram Prasad
                  All the petitioners are the resident of Village- Andar, Post- Andar, P.S.-
                  Andar, District- Siwan (Bihar).

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
            1.    The State of Bihar Through the Managing Director, Bihar Rajya Pool
                  Nirman Nigam Limited, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
            2.    The Collector Siwan, Bihar.
            3.    The Land Acquisition Officer Siwan.
            4.    The Senior Project Engineer Bihar Rajya Pool Nirman Nigam Limited,
                  Muzaffarpur (Bihar).

                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr.Uday Bhan Singh, Advocate
                                                Mrs. Kumari Shreya, Advocate
                  For the Pool Nigam     :      Md.Nadim Seraj, Advocate
                  For the Respondent/s   :      Mr.Atu Shankar, AC to SC 19
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
                                        ORAL ORDER

13   13-01-2026                   Heard Mr. Uday Bhan Singh along with Mrs. Kumari

                    Shreya, learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioners,

                    Md. Nadim Seraj, learned counsel for the Pool Nigam and Mr.

                    Atul Shankar, learned counsel for the State.

                                  2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                    petitioners submitted that the petitioners have already been paid
        Patna High Court CWJC No.820 of 2021(13) dt.13-01-2026
                                                    2/2




                  the amount of compensation as assessed, as such the grievance

                  of the petitioners has been redressed.

                              3. The present writ petition is accordingly consigned.



                                            (Purnendu Singh, J)
chn/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.