Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Brahmdeo PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Brahmdeo Prasad, filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Bihar and its officials. During the pendency of the writ, the petitioner’s grievances were reportedly resolved, and she expressed a desire to discontinue the proceedings. Counsel for the petitioner submitted a request for withdrawal of the case, which was accepted by the Court. The Court noted the petitioner's request and proceeded to dismiss the writ application on the ground of withdrawal. No substantive merits of the petition were adjudicated as the matter was withdrawn by the petitioner.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil procedure
  • high court
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8706 of 2023
                  ======================================================
                  Brahmdeo Prasad Son of Late Gokhul Prasad, resident of village Amera
                  Kharjama, P.S. Chandi, District - Nalanda.
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus

            1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land
                  Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
            2.    The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of
                  Bihar, Patna.
            3.    The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif.
            4.    The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Biharsharif, Nalanda.
            5.    The Accountant General, Bihar, Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s    :     Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Advocate
                                                Mrs. Pratibha Srivastava, Advocate
                  For the Respondent/s    :     Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam (AAG-12)
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    09-01-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    counsel for the State.

                                  2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits

                    that during pendency of the instant writ application, the

                    grievances / claim of the petitioner have been redressed and

                    does not want to pursue the same and hence, she prays for

                    withdrawal of the case.

                                  3. The present writ application stands dismissed as

                    withdrawn.



                                               (Ajit Kumar, J)
sharun/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.