Patna High Court
Ankit KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- AJIT KUMAR
Holding
The District Magistrate, Gaya, must decide the petitioner’s arms license application within eight weeks and communicate the order.
Summary
The petitioner, Ankit Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State authorities to grant him a license for a non‑prohibited bore rifle and pistol under the Arms Act, alleging that his application dated 10‑Oct‑2025 before the District Magistrate, Gaya, remained pending without any decision. The petitioner argued that the Arms Act mandates the competent authority to adjudicate such applications to ensure safety of life and property. The State contended that the application was in the prescribed format and the authority is bound to pass an order in accordance with law. The Court held that the District Magistrate must render a final decision on the license application within eight weeks and communicate the order to the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ application was disposed with the said direction.
Issues considered
- Whether the District Magistrate is obligated to decide a pending arms license application within a reasonable time under the Arms Act.
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to a license for a non‑prohibited bore rifle and pistol under the provisions of the Arms Act.
Legislation cited
Subjects
- Arms License
- Writ Jurisdiction
- Administrative Delay
- Arms Act
- District Magistrate
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.96 of 2026
======================================================
Ankit Kumar S/o Ranjeet Kumar Kaushal, Resident of Mohalla- Kumar
Colony, P.O.- Railway Station Gaya, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Gayaji.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Home
Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The District Magistrate-cum-District Arms Magistrate, Gaya.
3. The Superintendent of Police, Gaya.
4. The Sub Divisional Superintendent of Police, Gaya.
5. The Sub Divisional Officer, Gaya.
6. The Officer-in-charge, Kotwali, Gaya.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Additional Advocate General (13)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 15-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
AC to AAG-13.
2. The writ application has been filed seeking a
direction to the respondents to grant license for a NP Bore Rifle
and NP Bore Pistol to the petitioner in terms of provisions of
Arms Act and to dispose of the application filed by the
petitioner regarding the issuance of Arms License dated
10.10.2025 which is said to be pending before the Respondent
No.2/The District Magistrate-cum-District Arms Magistrate,
Gaya.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an
application in the prescribed format has already been filed
before the District Magistrate, Gaya, which is appended to the
writ application as Annexure-P/1. However, till date, no action
Patna High Court CWJC No.96 of 2026(2) dt.15-04-2026
2/2
has been taken with regard to the grant of an arms license. It is
further submitted that, as per the provisions of the Arms Act, a
license may be granted for ensuring the safety of life and
property upon an application being made. Despite the
application having been filed on 10.10.2025, no decision has yet
been taken.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State
submits that since the application has already been made in the
prescribed format, the competent authority is required to
adjudicate the same by passing an appropriate order in
accordance with law.
5. In view of the submissions made on behalf of the
parties, the District Magistrate, Gaya, is directed to take a final
decision on the petitioner’s application for grant of an arms
license within a period of eight weeks from today. The order so
passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner within the
said period.
6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the
instant writ application stands disposed.
(Ajit Kumar, J)
perwez
U
Checking your session…