Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. AlauddinversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The petition is disposed of, with the Court directing the respondents to determine and pay the petitioner’s retiral dues, including interest, in accordance with earlier orders.

Summary

The petitioner, a former sweeper of Samastipur Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and the Corporation to pay all his retiral benefits, including provident fund, gratuity, leave encashment, and revised salary and pension with interest. The respondents argued that the service records were missing and therefore the pensionary benefits could not be released. The petitioner relied on earlier orders of this Court in similar cases where the Corporation was directed to pay dues with interest at 9% per annum. The Court examined the submissions and noted that if any amounts had already been paid, they would be reflected in the final order. Consequently, the Court disposed of the petition, directing the Executive Officer or competent municipal authorities to determine and pay the petitioner’s dues, referencing the earlier orders for guidance.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to payment of all retiral benefits under the revised pay scales and applicable statutes.
  • Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued directing the State and Municipal Corporation to release the pending pensionary benefits.
  • Whether interest at the rate of 9% per annum is applicable from the date of retirement to actual payment.

Subjects

  • retiral benefits
  • pension
  • mandamus
  • municipal corporation
  • provident fund
  • gratuity
  • leave encashment
  • interest
  • salary revision

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9636 of 2024
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Alauddin S/o Md. Tahir, Ward No. 02, Pusa Road, P.O. and P.S.-
                 Dharampur, District-Samastipur.

                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary cum Commissioner,
                 Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Municipal       Commissioner,    Samastipur    Municipal   Corporation,
                 Samastipur.
           3.    The Standing Committee through the Chairman, Municipal Corporation,
                 Samastipur.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr.Vikash Kumar Jha
                 For the Respondent No.2:       Mr.Prince Kumar Mishra
                                                Ms.Priyanka Kumari
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   22-01-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

                   learned counsel representing the Corporation as well as the

                   State.

                               2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition with the

                   following relief(s):-

                                                      “(i) For issuance of a writ in
                                            the nature of writ of mandamus directing
                                            and commanding the respondents
                                            authorities to make payment of all retiral
                                            benefits of the petitioner payable to him
                                            under different heads like as provident
                                            fund, gratuity, leave encashment, GIC
                                            etc. after fixing the pay and pension
                                            accordingly in the light of revised fifth
                                            and sixth pay scale including the arrears
                                            amount of revised salary and pension
                                            with interest and calculation chart as the
Patna High Court CWJC No.9636 of 2024(3) dt.22-01-2026
                                            2/3




                                   petitioner has been ordered to be retired
                                   with effect from 31/07/2011, as an
                                   Sweeper, from the service of Nagar
                                   Parishad      Samastipur     at   Present
                                   Municipal Corporation, Samastipur.
                                             (ii) For issuance of any other
                                   consequential writ / order/direction to
                                   the respondents for which the petitioner
                                   is found to be entitled to under the facts
                                   and circumstances of the case.”

                      3. Learned counsel representing the Corporation

          submits that the records are missing and, therefore, pensionary

          benefits have not been released in favour of this petitioner and

          the final order has not been passed.

                      4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner

          relied on certain orders passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this

          Court, wherein similar stand was taken by the Corporation and

          the Court was pleased to pass order directing the respondents to

          pay the retiral dues at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of

          retirement till the date of actual payment. He further submits

          that this writ petition may also be disposed of in light of the

          aforesaid orders.

                      5. Learned counsel for the respondents-Corporation

          submits that he would examine the case of the petitioner along

          with the orders of C.W.J.C. No.10632 of 2019 as well as

          C.W.J.C. No. 10633 of 2019 passed in the case of Ram Sevak

          Paswan and Lalan Prasad Singh, respectively, and if his case is
           Patna High Court CWJC No.9636 of 2024(3) dt.22-01-2026
                                                       3/3




                     found similar to that of those writ petitioners, necessary order

                     shall be passed within a period of eight weeks from the date of

                     submission of a representation with a copy of this order.

                                 6. Needless to say that during pendency of the writ

                     petition, if certain amounts under different heads have already

                     been released then such amount shall be indicated in the final

                     order, which is expected to be passed by the Executive Officer

                     or by the authorities of the Municipal Corporation, competent in

                     law by referring to the supportive materials, with respect to the

                     amounts settled in favour to the petitioner in question.

                                 7. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands

                     disposed of.



                                                  (Ajit Kumar, J)
abhishekkr/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.