Patna High Court
Rajiv Kumar VermaversusPushpa Kumari Verma
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
Holding
The court held that the appellant may withdraw the appeal and is granted liberty to file an appropriate petition.
Summary
The appellant, Rajiv Kumar Verma, filed a miscellaneous appeal seeking leave to withdraw the appeal and obtain liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the same order. The respondent, Pushpa Kumari Verma, opposed the request. The sole issue before the bench was whether the court should permit the appellant to withdraw the appeal and subsequently file a new petition. The court, after hearing counsel, granted the leave sought, allowing the appellant to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file an appropriate petition.
Issues considered
- Whether the appellant is entitled to withdraw the appeal and be granted liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the same order
Subjects
- appeal withdrawal
- procedural law
- civil procedure
- leave of court
- petition
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Appeal No.161 of 2020
======================================================
Rajiv Kumar Verma Son of Sita Ram Verma, Resident of Mohalla-Sahiganj,
P.S. Bihar District Nalanda.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
Pushpa Kumari Verma Wife of Rajiv Kumar Verma, Daughter of Prakash
Prasad Verma Resident of Mohalla-Sahiganj, P.S. Bihar, District Nalanda At
Present resident of Mohalla Alamganj, P.S. BIhar District Nalanda.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gaurav Kumar Verma
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA)
5 15-01-2026 Learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave of this
Court to withdraw the present appeal with a liberty to file
appropriate petition challenging the order which is under
challenge in the present appeal.
2. Leave, as sought for by the appellant, is granted.
3. In view of the above, the present appeal is
dismissed as withdrawn with above mentioned liberty to the
appellant.
(Nani Tagia, J)
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Amrendra/-
U
Checking your session…