Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Indu Kumari @ Indu DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The petition is disposed of as not pressed following the petitioner's withdrawal.

Summary

Indu Kumari filed a petition challenging actions of the State of Bihar and various officials. The petitioner, through counsel, indicated a desire to withdraw the petition, noting that the name of Respondent No.9 also appeared in related proceedings. The court considered the withdrawal request and, finding no objection from the opposite parties, disposed of the petition as not pressed. No substantive merits of the case were examined. The order was pronounced by Justices Mohit Kumar Shah and Alok Kumar Pandey.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition should be proceeded with after the petitioner seeks to withdraw it

Subjects

  • withdrawal
  • petition disposal
  • writ petition
  • letters patent appeal
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                            Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1386 of 2022
                                                      In
                                  Letters Patent Appeal No.206 of 2020
                 ======================================================
                 Indu Kumari @ Indu Devi wife of Pappu Kumar, Resident of Hari Nagar,
                 Chaugaon, Laund, Sirdala, P.S.- Sirdala, District- Nawada.

                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus

           1.    The State of Bihar Bihar
           2.    The Director, Integrated Child Development Services, Patna.
           3.    The Commissioner, Gaya.
           4.    The Deputy Director, ICDS, Magadh Commissionery, Gaya.
           5.    The District Magistrate, Nawada.
           6.    The Sub- Divisional Officer, Rajauli, Nawada.
           7.    The District Programme Officer, Nawada.
           8.    The Child Development Project Officer, Sirdala, Nawada.
           9.    Renu Bala, wife of Sanjay Mistri, Resident of Hari Ngar, Chaugaon, Laund,
                 Sirdala, P.S.- Sirdala, District- Nawada.

                                                                      ... ... Opposite Party/s

                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :   Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :   Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha (GA 7)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)

3   29-01-2026                  The learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset,

                   seeks not to press the present petition, realizing the fact that the

                   name of Respondent No. 9 i.e. Renu Bala finds place, both in

                   the memo of appeal as also the cause title of the writ petition

                   bearing CWJC No. 14336 of 2014.
               Patna High Court MJC No.1386 of 2022(3) dt.29-01-2026
                                                           2/2




                                      2. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of

                         as not pressed.



                                                 (Mohit Kumar Shah, J)


                                                 (Alok Kumar Pandey, J)
alok/k.c.jha

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.