Patna High Court
Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- AJIT KUMAR
Holding
The application was disposed of as there was no remaining issue for adjudication.
Summary
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, filed a writ application before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and its officials. The State responded by producing a memo dated 03.08.2022, indicating that the requisite order had already been issued by the Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer, District Council, Aurangabad, and that no further matter remained for adjudication. The petitioner’s counsel was unable to refute the State’s submission or demonstrate any surviving issue. Consequently, the Court found that there was nothing left to be decided on the application. The Court therefore disposed of the petition, effectively dismissing the writ application.
Issues considered
- What, if any, relief remains for the petitioner after the State’s submission that the necessary order has already been passed?
Subjects
- writ jurisdiction
- administrative order
- petition disposal
- no remaining issue
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1889 of 2019
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20260 of 2014
======================================================
Chandan Kumar S/o Late Ramashish Thakur Resident of Village - Berhna,
P.O. - Malhara, P.S. - Dhibra, District - Aurangabad, (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Mr. Vinodanand Jha,
Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. Mr. Sushil Kumar The Director, Department of Education, Government of
Bihar, Patna.
3. Mr. Abhishek Singh The District Magistrate-cum-Chairman, District
Compassionate Committee, Aurangabad, (Bihar).
4. Mr. Md. Alim The District Education Officer, Aurangabad, (Bihar).
5. Mr. Ajay Jashawal The District Programme Officer (Establishment),
Aurangabad, (Bihar).
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lal Bahadur Singh
For the Opposite Party/s : AC to AAG-15
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
8 19-02-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the State are present.
2. Learned counsel for the State, referring to the order
passed by the Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chief
Executive Officer, District Council, Aurangabad, as contained in
Memo No. 515 dated 03.08.2022, submits that the necessary
order has already been passed and that nothing survives for
adjudication.
3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner is
Patna High Court MJC No.1889 of 2019(8) dt.19-02-2026
2/2
not in a position to rebut the submissions made on behalf of the
State.
4. Accordingly, the present application stands
disposed of.
(Ajit Kumar, J)
shikha/-
U
Checking your session…