Patna High Court
Md. IsmailversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- AJIT KUMAR
Holding
The application is disposed of as infructuous.
Summary
Md. Ismail filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and several education officials seeking relief. The petitioner alleged a grievance that required adjudication. The respondent counsel submitted that the petitioner’s grievance had already been redressed and that no issue remained for the Court to consider. The Court accepted this submission and held that the petition had become infructuous. Consequently, the application was disposed of without further hearing.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner’s grievance has been redressed rendering the writ application infructuous
Subjects
- Writ jurisdiction
- Infructuous application
- Petition disposed
- Grievance redressed
- High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2047 of 2019
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.480 of 2019
======================================================
Md. Ismail Son of Late Md. Yakub R/o Village-Nagarpura, P.S.-Simari,
District-Buxar (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar Bihar
2. R.K. Mahajan Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of
Bihar, Patna
3. Mansoor Alam Regional Deputy Director of Education Department, Munger
Range, Munger
4. Dinesh Chaudhary District Education Officer, Munger
5. Narendra Kumar District Programme Officer (Establishment) Munger-cum-
Drawing and Dispersing Officer, Government High School (Zila School),
Munger
6. Ranjan Kumar The Incharge Principal Government High School (Zila
School), District-Munger
7. Mani K. The Accountant General Bihar, Veer Chand Patel Path, Patna
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pratap Sharma
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey (Aag15)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
5 27-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and that nothing
survives for adjudication in the present matter.
3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the present
application stands disposed of as having become infructuous.
(Ajit Kumar, J)
shikha/-
U
Checking your session…