Patna High Court
Ramanand MahtonversusBrahmadeo Mahton
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- AJIT KUMAR
Holding
The court restored Second Appeal No. 207 of 2006 to its original file.
Summary
The petitioner, Ramanand Mahton, filed a petition seeking restoration of Second Appeal No. 207 of 2006. The petition relied on submissions made in paragraphs 5 to 8 of the restoration petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents were heard on 16-02-2026. The court examined the submissions and concluded that the appeal should be reinstated to its original file. Consequently, the petition for restoration was allowed, and the second appeal was restored.
Issues considered
- Whether Second Appeal No. 207 of 2006 should be restored to its original file
Subjects
- restoration of appeal
- second appeal
- procedural law
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2338 of 2021
In
SECOND APPEAL No.207 of 2006
======================================================
Ramanand Mahton Son of Late Udho Mahton Resident of Village -
Ranisakarpura, Paragana - Farakiya, P.S. and District- Khagaria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. Brahmadeo Mahton Son of Late Jagat Mahton Resident of Village -
Ranisakarpura, Paragana - Farakiya, P.S. and District- Khagaria.
2. Ramdeo Mahton Son of Late Babulal Mahton Resident of Village -
Ranisakarpura, Paragana - Farakiya, P.S. and District- Khagaria.
3. Anandi Mahton Son of Late Babulal Mahton Resident of Village -
Ranisakarpura, Paragana - Farakiya, P.S. and District- Khagaria.
4. Most. Halo Devi Widow of Late Udho Mahton Resident of Village -
Ranisakarpura, Paragana - Farakiya, P.S. and District- Khagaria.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amarendra Nath Verma, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Prakritita Sharma, Adv.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
4 16-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the Respondents.
2. In view of the submissions made in paragraph-5 to
8 of the restoration petition, Second Appeal No. 207 of 2006 is
restored to its original file.
3. Accordingly, the instant petition for restoration
stands allowed.
(Ajit Kumar, J)
perwez
U
Checking your session…