Patna High Court
Krishna PrasadversusSri Chandra Vir Raman, General Manager
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- PURNENDU SINGH
Holding
The contempt application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Krishna Prasad, filed a contempt application against several officials of the North Eastern Railway. The application sought to hold the railway officials in contempt of court. During the hearing on 24-04-2026, the petitioner’s counsel requested to withdraw the contempt application. The court considered the request and noted that the petitioner had voluntarily sought withdrawal. Accordingly, the court dismissed the contempt application as withdrawn, without further adjudication on the merits. No other substantive issues were addressed.
Issues considered
- Whether a contempt application filed by a petitioner can be withdrawn and dismissed as withdrawn?
Subjects
- contempt of court
- withdrawal of application
- civil writ jurisdiction
- high court procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2679 of 2023
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13961 of 2013
======================================================
Krishna Prasad Son of Late Mithu Shah, Resident of Village - Videshi Tola,
Thawe, Police Station - Thawe, District - Gopalganj
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. Sri Chandra Vir Raman, General Manager N.E. Railway, Gorakhpur.
2. Sri A.K. Mishra, The Chief Engineer, Bridge Construction, N.E. Railway,
Gorakhpur.
3. Sri Binod Kumar Singh, the Deputy Chief Engineer, Bridge Construction,
N.E. Railway, Gorakhpur.
4. Sri Kuwer Surendra Pratap, Assistant Executive Engineer, N.E. Railway,
Gorakhpur.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Prasad, Advocate
Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, Advocate
For the Railwa : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, C.G.C.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
ORAL ORDER
3 24-04-2026 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner seeks to withdraw the present contempt application.
2. Accordingly, the present contempt application
stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
Niraj/-
U
Checking your session…