Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. ShamimuddinversusDr. Koshalendra Singh

Decided
Disposal
CONSIGNED

Holding

The court held that the order under contempt has been complied with and therefore the contempt petition is consigned.

Summary

Petitioner Md. Shamimuddin filed a contempt petition against several officials of the Bihar State Co-operative Land Development Bank and the Regional PF Commissioner. The respondents produced a communication dated 04-12-2025 (Memo No.5073) indicating compliance with the earlier contempt order. The court examined the memo and concluded that the order under contempt had been satisfied. It advised the petitioner that any further grievance could be pursued through appropriate legal remedies. Consequently, the contempt petition was consigned, effectively dismissing it.

Issues considered

  • Whether the respondents have complied with the order under contempt.
  • Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed or further relief granted.

Subjects

  • contempt
  • civil writ
  • co-operative bank
  • compliance
  • petition dismissal

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3523 of 2023
                                                      In
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12981 of 2023
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Shamimuddin Son of Late Alimuddin Retired Section Officer, Bihar
                 State Operative Land Development Bank and Resident of Mohalla- Sherpur
                 Chowhatta, P.S.- Bihar Sharif Town, P.O.- Bihar Sharif, District- Nalanda.

                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
           1.    Dr. Koshalendra Singh Son of Not Known, Bihar State Co-Operative Land
                 Development Bank, through its Managing Director, Budh Marg, Patna.
           2.    Dr. Koshlendra Singh, S/o Not Known, The Multi State Co-Operative Land
                 Development Bank, through its Managing Director, Budh Marg, Patna.
           3.    Dr. Koshlendra Singh, Son of Not Known, The Managing Director, Bihar
                 State Co-Operative Land Development Bank, Budh Marg, Patna.
           4.    Prem Bahadur Singh, S/o Not Known, Accounts Officer (B.O.T.) Bihar State
                 Co- Operatives Land Development Bank, Budh Marg, Patna.
           5.    Madhu Shyam Arya (M.S Arya), The Regional P.F. Commissioner, Bhavish
                 Nidhi Bhawan, R. Block, Patna.

                                               ... ... Respondents/Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :    Mr.Mohammad Abu Shajar, Advocate
                 For the O.P. Nos.1 to 4 :    Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Advocate
                 For OP No.5             :    Mr. Prakash Verma, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   09-01-2026                 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner and learned counsels for the respondents.

                               2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of               the

                   respondents produced a copy of the communication dated

                   04.12.2025, contained in Memo No.5073 and the same is

                   directed to be kept on record.

                               3. In light of the communication contained in Memo

                   No.5073 dated 04.12.2025, the order under contempt appears to
           Patna High Court MJC No.3523 of 2023(5) dt.09-01-2026
                                                       2/2




                     have been complied.

                                  4. However, the petitioner if still aggrieved in any

                     manner, he would at be liberty to avail appropriate remedy in

                     accordance with law.

                                  5. The present contempt petition, accordingly, stands

                     consigned.


                                               (Purnendu Singh, J)

Sanjay/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.