Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. SabirversusThe State of Bihar, Mr. Dipak Kumar Singh, the Principal Secretary, Land Reforms Department

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court allowed the withdrawal of the contempt application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Md. Sabir filed a contempt application against the State of Bihar and several officials, alleging non‑compliance with an earlier order dated 3‑July‑2025 in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1116 of 2025. The petitioner later claimed that the order had been complied with and sought the court's permission to withdraw the contempt proceeding. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted a request for withdrawal, which the court considered. The court granted permission to withdraw the contempt application, finding no further ground to proceed. Consequently, the contempt application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a contempt application can be withdrawn after the alleged non‑compliance has been remedied

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • withdrawal of application
  • compliance with court order
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • high court procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3942 of 2025
                                                       In
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1116 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Sabir S/o Abdul Hannan, Resident of Village- Ahmadpur, P.O.- Khesrahi,
                 P.S.- Baligaon, Anchal- Patepur, District- Vaishali.

                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar, Mr. Dipak Kumar Singh, the Principal Secretary, Land
                 Reforms Department Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariate, Patna.
           2.    Shri Varsha Singh, the District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur.
           3.    Mr. Kislay Kushwaha, Sub-Divisional Officer, Mahua, District- Vaishali.
           4.    Khurshid Akram, Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Mahua, District-
                 Vaishali.
           5.    Mr. Munna Prasad, Circle Officer, Pajtepur Anchal, District- Vaishali.
           6.    Mr. Siddharth Patel, Superintendent of Police, Vaishali at Hajipur.
           7.    Sudh Kumari, S.H.O., Baligaon Piolice Station, District- Vaishali.
           8.    Md. Samsujjoha, S/o Late Abdul Hadi, Resident of Village- Ahmadpur, P.O.-
                 Khesrahi, P.S.- Baligaon, District- Vaishali.
           9.    Sultana Begam, W/o Md. Samsujjoha, Resident of Village- Ahmadpur, P.O.-
                 Khesrahi, P.S.- Baligaon, District- Vaishali.
           10. Md. Taukir Ahmad @ Sonu, S/o Md. Samsujjoha, Resident of Village-
               Ahmadpur, P.O.- Khesrahi, P.S.- Baligaon, District- Vaishali.
           11. Md. Tafjil Ahmad @ Saddam, S/o Md. Samsujjoha, Resident of Village-
               Ahmadpur, P.O.- Khesrahi, P.S.- Baligaon, District- Vaishali.
           12. Md. Mohiuddin, s/o Late Md. Mateen, Resident of Village- Ahmadpur, P.O.-
               Khesrahi, P.S.- Baligaon, District- Vaishali.
           13. Md. Saddam, S/o Late Md. Mateen, Resident of Village- Ahmadpur, P.O.-
               Khesrahi, P.S.- Baligaon, District- Vaishali.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr.Amarnath Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr.Standing Counsel 22
                                                AC to SC-22
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   06-02-2026               1.    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned AC to SC-22.
          Patna High Court MJC No.3942 of 2025(3) dt.06-02-2026
                                                      2/2




                             2.     Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                    petitioner submits that the order dated 3-7-2025 in CWJC No.

                    1116 of 2025 has been complied with, thus seeks permission to

                    withdraw the instant contempt application.

                             3.     Permission is accorded.

                             4.     Accordingly, the instant contempt application is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                              (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.