Patna High Court
Bindu DeviversusShree Ramashankar Daftuvar, The Director Bal Vikash Rapiyojna, Government of Bihar and Ors
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- AJIT KUMAR
Holding
The court disposed of the contempt petition, granting the petitioner liberty to challenge the order before the appropriate forum by filing a representation.
Summary
Petitioner Bindu Devi filed a contempt petition challenging an order that required her to make a representation, which was subsequently disposed of rejecting her claim. The petitioner, through counsel, sought liberty to contest the disposal of her representation before a suitable forum. The court considered the petitioner's request for such liberty. It held that the contempt petition could be disposed of while granting the petitioner permission to approach the appropriate forum by filing a fresh representation. Consequently, the petition was dismissed with the liberty to challenge the order elsewhere.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner can be granted liberty to challenge the disposal of her representation before an appropriate forum
- Whether the contempt petition should be disposed of with such liberty
Subjects
- contempt
- representation
- jurisdiction
- high court
- procedural law
- liberty to challenge
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.872 of 2019
In
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3088 of 2016
======================================================
Bindu Devi Wife of Shree Ramashish Singh Resident of Mohalla - Mahatma
Gandhi Nagar, Buxar, Ward No. 9, P.O. P.S. - Buxar, District- Buxar 802103
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. Shree Ramashankar Daftuvar, The Director Bal Vikash Rapiyojna,
Government of Bihar and Ors Patna
2. Shree Anand Kishore Divisional Commissioner, The Commissioner, Patna,
Bihar
3. Shree Raghuwendra Singh The District Magistrate, Buxar
4. Shree Shashi Kant Paswan The District Program Officer, Buxar
5. Gunjan Kumari The Child Development Project Officer, Sadar Block Buxar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Surendra Kumar Singh,Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha ( GA 7)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
8 16-02-2026 Heard the parties concerned.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in
compliance of the order in contempt, the representation of the
petitioner has been disposed of rejecting the claim of the
petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks for a
liberty to challenge the same at an appropriate forum.
4. In view of the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the instant contempt petition stands
disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to challenge the
Patna High Court MJC No.872 of 2019(8) dt.16-02-2026
2/2
same before the appropriate forum by filing an appropriate
representation, if so advised.
(Ajit Kumar, J)
perwez
U
Checking your session…