Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6253 judgments · newest first · showing 5401–5600
Imran @ Immu was preventively detained on 27 December 2025 by the Surat Police Commissioner under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". The detainee filed a petition challenging the legality of the detention, arguing that no material was placed before …
Sanjaykumar was preventively detained on 31‑12‑2025 as a "bootlegger" under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his wife, arguing that the detaining authority had no material showing any disturbance to …
Ahmed Raza was preventively detained on 28‑12‑2025 by the Surat Police Commissioner under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the order, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the order …
The petitioner, Asif Mohammad Husen, was detained and filed a special criminal application before the Gujarat High Court seeking relief. During the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner was released from custody. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that, in view of the release, the petition …
Husen Rasulbhai Jammiyana was preventively detained on 29‑12‑2025 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his friend. The petitioner argued that no material was placed before the detaining authority …
Popat Harishbhai Khokhariya (Mina) challenged a preventive detention order dated 24‑11‑2025 issued by the Ahmedabad Police Commissioner under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, alleging he was a "dangerous person." The petitioner argued that no material …
Mohamad Vasim was preventively detained on 25‑12‑2025 by the Surat Police Commissioner under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a “dangerous person”. He challenged the order through a petition filed by his friend. The petitioner argued that there was no material showing …
Jagdishbhai Bambhaniya was preventively detained on 1 January 2026 by the District Magistrate under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his cousin, arguing that the authority had no material showing any …
Vikrambhai Chauhan filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging his detention order dated 22‑12‑2025 issued by the District Magistrate under Section 3 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The petitioner argued that no material was placed …
The petitioner, Rohitbhai Vaja, challenged a detention order dated 01.01.2026 issued by the District Magistrate under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, invoking Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. He argued that no material was placed before the authority to show that …
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed a first appeal challenging an award of Rs.4,55,000 in a road‑accident claim. The respondents argued that the amount was modest and that the appeal need not be heard on merits. The High Court observed that the sum involved was small and, to spare the parties from …
The Akhil Gujarat Nagarpalika Karmachari Mandal filed a Special Civil Application against the State of Gujarat and others challenging a recruitment advertisement. The respondents submitted a communication dated 28.01.2026 indicating that the advertisement had been withdrawn due to identified …
The petitioner, Rama Giganbhai Mori, challenged the State of Gujarat for failing to verify his caste certificate, which prevented his appointment as a Lokrakshak Police Constable. He relied on a prior order of the Co‑ordinate Bench dated 26 July 2021, affirmed by a Division Bench on 25 November …
The petitioner, Mayur Devrajbai Chhelana, challenged the State of Gujarat for not verifying his caste certificate, which delayed his appointment as Lokrakshak Jail Sepoy, Class‑III. He relied on a prior order of the Coordinating Bench (Special Civil Application No. 1858 of 2021) and its confirmation …
Arvindbhai Ajitbhai Solanki filed an application seeking condonation of a 35‑day delay in filing his criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat. The application was presented before a two‑judge bench of the Gujarat High Court. The court examined the averments made in the application regarding the …
The applicant, Shree Thakorji Trading Co. through its proprietor, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 419(4) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking leave to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on a recent Gujarat High …
Mayur @ Lalo filed a special criminal application seeking permission to withdraw his writ petition against the State of Gujarat and others. The petitioner, through counsel, requested the court to allow the withdrawal. The court recorded the submission and considered the request. No substantive …
Narendra Netram Sharma filed a Special Criminal Application (Habeas Corpus) No. 1217 of 2026 against the State of Gujarat and others. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Darshil N. Prajapati, while the respondent was represented by Ms. Monali Bhatt. During the proceedings, the petitioner sought …
The petitioner, a daily‑wage nursery labourer employed since 2000, was orally terminated in June 2018 without notice or retrenchment benefits. He raised an industrial dispute (Reference LCP No. 10 of 2020) before the Labour Court, which awarded a lump‑sum compensation of Rs 1,00,000 in lieu of …
Arunaben filed a criminal revision application (R/CR.RA/212/2026) before the Gujarat High Court challenging an order of a subordinate court. The applicant later discovered inadvertent mistakes in the petition and sought the court's permission to withdraw the revision and file a fresh one. The court …
The applicant, Sanjaybhai Nathabhai Khistariya, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The applicant's counsel later requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted. The Court granted the request, ordering the …
The appellants filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Dahod dated 03‑10‑2024 in a claim arising from the death of Jigarbhai Manglabhai Damor in a road accident on 07‑11‑2016. The High Court examined the …
Petitioner Priyanka Pratapbhai Vasava filed a special civil application seeking a direction that the representation dated 31‑12‑2021 made to the Registrar of Shri Govind Guru University be decided. The Court, noting that the representation had remained pending for over five years, directed the …
The applicant, Ravi Textile Traders (through POA), filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 419(4) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking leave to appeal an acquittal of the respondents under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant later sought …
The petitioners, Narvarbhai Chhedadbhaï Vasav, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in preferring the main matter and in filing a second appeal to bring legal heirs on record. The respondents, Bhimjibhai Chhedabhai Vasava, were served with an unserved expired notice. The High Court …
The appellants, legal heirs of Neelamben who died after being struck by an Eeco car on 3 March 2021, appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award that reduced compensation by 25% on the ground of contributory negligence and fixed the amount at Rs.9,40,000. The High Court examined the evidence, …
The applicant, Hiraji Aachar @Aachu Marwada (Bhadru), filed a second appeal (No. 2126/2025) and subsequently sought condonation of delay in preferring the main matter. The respondent, Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd., opposed the application. The court examined the averments made in the application …
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. filed a first appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs.4,36,167 to the victims of a road accident. The High Court examined the appeal but noted that the amount involved was modest. Consequently, …
Jagdishbhai Sawabhai Patel filed a criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat. The appellant was represented by Ms. N M Zaveri, while the respondent was represented by Ms. Shruti Pathak. No party appeared before the court despite two calls and no request for adjournment was made. The court noted …
Sintex BAPL Limited filed a series of Special Civil Applications against Thakor Ranputji PunjaJi and others, seeking relief in the High Court of Gujarat. The petitioner contended that several reference matters before the Labour Court (Reference Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, 13 of 2020, etc.) had been …
The Oriental Insurance Company appealed a decision favoring Parasben Vikrambhai Parmar and others concerning a claim of Rs.4,60,500. The respondents argued that the appeal should not be entertained due to the modest quantum of the claim. The Court agreed, noting that the amount was small and there …
The appellant Siddik Ismail Kumbhar was convicted for murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and attempt to conceal dead body (Sec. 201 IPC) based largely on circumstantial evidence, a police‑recorded confession, and recovered items. The prosecution's case rested on motive, a "last seen together" theory, and alleged …
The petitioner, Bholabhai Hirabhai Bambhania, filed a special civil application seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the Commissioner of Schools and other respondents to decide an application dated 26‑12‑2005 for correction of his birth date in his service book. The application had remained pending …
The case arose from a motor accident on 15‑12‑2008 in which the deceased Himanshu Parasiya was killed when a Mazda driver entered the road from the wrong side and collided with his motorcycle. The deceased’s family filed a Motor Accident Claim (MAC) petition and the trial tribunal awarded …
The appellant challenged a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs 2,89,000 compensation for the death of Naranbhai, caused by a tractor driven without a valid licence. The tribunal had exonerated ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company, holding the driver‑owner liable. The appellant sought (i) a …
The petitioner, Prafula Nikhilkumar Shah, had received all retirement benefits including arrears but alleged that interest was not paid on the delayed payment of those benefits, which were paid after a delay of about three and a half years. The petitioner sought to make a representation for interest …
The appellants were convicted under IPC sections 323 and 504, and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and insulting a member of a Scheduled Caste. The parties later settled the dispute with community intervention, and …
The applicant, Digeshkumar Govindbhai Solanki, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal against the order in Criminal Appeal No. 24484 of 2025. The respondent, State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel. No party appeared before the court despite two calls, and no request …
The State of Gujarat filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging an award dated 31 August 2018 made by the Controlling Authority, Valsad, under the Payment of Wages Act. The award required the State to pay the respondent watchman Rs.20,354.40, which …
Petitioners challenged awards of the Valsad Labour Court directing them to pay Rs. 80,560 and costs, alleging the awards were illegal, arbitrary and beyond the Court's jurisdiction, particularly concerning leave encashment and the computation under Section 33C(2) of the applicable labour Act. The …
Petitioners challenged awards of the Valsad Labour Court directing them to pay Rs. 80,560 and costs, alleging the awards were illegal, arbitrary and beyond the Court's jurisdiction, particularly concerning leave encashment and the computation under Section 33C(2) of the applicable labour Act. The …
Petitioners challenged awards of the Valsad Labour Court directing them to pay Rs. 80,560 and costs, alleging the awards were illegal, arbitrary and beyond the Court's jurisdiction, particularly concerning leave encashment and the computation under Section 33C(2) of the applicable labour Act. The …
Petitioners challenged awards of the Valsad Labour Court directing them to pay Rs. 80,560 and costs, alleging the awards were illegal, arbitrary and beyond the Court's jurisdiction, particularly concerning leave encashment and the computation under Section 33C(2) of the applicable labour Act. The …
The New India Assurance Company challenged the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chhotaudepur award dated 28.03.2024 in MACP No.83/2021, which partly allowed the claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and awarded Rs.15,82,000 to the claimants. The insurer contended that the motorcycle …
Vihabhai Panchabhai Patel appealed against his conviction for murder, robbery, and related offences under Sections 302, 392, 397 and 449 of the IPC. The trial court relied on circumstantial evidence, including the appellant’s alleged presence with the victims, recovery of stolen ornaments at his …
The petitioners, Vaishakhi Pareshbhai Shah and another, filed a revision application eight days after the prescribed period and sought condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The State of Gujarat and another respondent opposed the condonation. The court examined the memorandum of …
Ranchhodbhai Lakhabhai Bariya, a workman in the Gujarat irrigation department, challenged a Labour Court award dated 07‑06‑2019 that granted him a lump‑sum compensation instead of reinstatement after his termination. He filed a petition under Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution and the …
Dhirabhai Lalabhai Sangada, a workman in the irrigation department, challenged a Labour Court award dated 07‑06‑2019 that granted only lump‑sum compensation after his termination, seeking reinstatement with continuity of service, back wages and retirement benefits under Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 …
The petitioner, a workman in the irrigation department, challenged a Labour Court award dated 03‑06‑2019 that granted only lump‑sum compensation and denied reinstatement. Relying on Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, he sought quashing of the …
Ramabhai Rupabhai Damor, a workman in the Gujarat irrigation department, challenged a Labour Court award dated 1 June 2019 that granted him a lump‑sum compensation instead of reinstatement. He filed a special civil application under Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution and the Industrial …
The widow of deceased workman Fulabhai Damor filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, challenging a Labour Court award dated 03‑06‑2019 that granted only a lump‑sum compensation and denied reinstatement or …
JESINGBHAI ARJANBHAI SANGADA, a workman, challenged a Labour Court award dated 04‑06‑2019 that granted only lump‑sum compensation and denied reinstatement. He filed a special civil application under Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The High …
Kesarbhai Khatrabhai Tariyad, a workman in the Gujarat irrigation department, challenged a Labour Court award dated 06‑06‑2019 that granted him lump‑sum compensation instead of reinstatement. He filed a special civil application under Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution and the …
The petitioners, M/s. Alankar Traders through Jayesh Gopaldas Shah, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay in a criminal appeal. No counsel appeared for either party despite two calls, and no request for adjournment was made. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker …
The petitioner, Sintex BAPL Limited, filed a series of special civil applications seeking relief. The petitioner argued that multiple Labour Court reference cases (Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, etc.) had been dismissed for default on 13‑02‑2025 and 18‑02‑2025, rendering the pending petitions moot. …
The applicant, Milan Harishbhai Maheta, filed a Civil Revision Application seeking condonation of delay in filing the CRA, alleging that he suffered from bipolar disorder and depression since July 2022, which prevented him from contacting counsel. The applicant’s counsel, Senior Advocate Mehul S. …
The petitioner, Sintex BAPL Limited, filed a series of special civil applications seeking relief. The petitioner argued that multiple Labour Court reference cases (Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, etc.) had been dismissed for default on 13‑02‑2025 and 18‑02‑2025, rendering the pending petitions moot. …
Sintex BAPL Limited filed a series of Special Civil Applications against Thakor Ranputji PunjaJi and others, seeking relief in the High Court of Gujarat. The petitioner contended that several reference matters before the Labour Court (Reference Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, 13 of 2020, etc.) had been …
The petitioner, Sintex BAPL Limited, filed a series of special civil applications seeking relief. The petitioner argued that multiple Labour Court reference cases (Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, etc.) had been dismissed for default on 13‑02‑2025 and 18‑02‑2025, rendering the pending petitions moot. …
Sintex BAPL Limited filed a series of Special Civil Applications against Thakor Ranputji PunjaJi and others, seeking relief in the High Court of Gujarat. The petitioner contended that several reference matters before the Labour Court (Reference Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, 13 of 2020, etc.) had been …
Sintex BAPL Limited filed a series of Special Civil Applications against Thakor Ranputji PunjaJi and others, seeking relief in the High Court of Gujarat. The petitioner contended that several reference matters before the Labour Court (Reference Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, 13 of 2020, etc.) had been …
Sintex BAPL Limited filed a series of Special Civil Applications against Thakor Ranputji PunjaJi and others, seeking relief in the High Court of Gujarat. The petitioner contended that several reference matters before the Labour Court (Reference Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, 13 of 2020, etc.) had been …
Sintex BAPL Limited filed a series of Special Civil Applications against Thakor Ranputji PunjaJi and others, seeking relief in the High Court of Gujarat. The petitioner contended that several reference matters before the Labour Court (Reference Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, 13 of 2020, etc.) had been …
The petitioner, Sintex BAPL Limited, filed a series of special civil applications seeking relief. The petitioner argued that multiple Labour Court reference cases (Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, etc.) had been dismissed for default on 13‑02‑2025 and 18‑02‑2025, rendering the pending petitions moot. …
The petitioner, Sintex BAPL Limited, filed a series of special civil applications seeking relief. The petitioner argued that multiple Labour Court reference cases (Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, etc.) had been dismissed for default on 13‑02‑2025 and 18‑02‑2025, rendering the pending petitions moot. …
The petitioner, Sintex BAPL Limited, filed a series of special civil applications seeking relief. The petitioner argued that multiple Labour Court reference cases (Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, etc.) had been dismissed for default on 13‑02‑2025 and 18‑02‑2025, rendering the pending petitions moot. …
Sintex BAPL Limited filed a series of Special Civil Applications against Thakor Ranputji PunjaJi and others, seeking relief in the High Court of Gujarat. The petitioner contended that several reference matters before the Labour Court (Reference Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, 13 of 2020, etc.) had been …
Sintex BAPL Limited filed a series of Special Civil Applications against Thakor Ranputji PunjaJi and others, seeking relief in the High Court of Gujarat. The petitioner contended that several reference matters before the Labour Court (Reference Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, 13 of 2020, etc.) had been …
M/s Shreeji Vitrified Pvt. Ltd. appealed against the disallowance of a Form‑C claim of Rs.92,30,891 by the First Appellate Authority, which was upheld by the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal. The appellant argued that the negative report on which the disallowance was based was never furnished to it, …
Somendu Chakraborty, CEO of Selvas and Daman branch of Katariya Automobiles Pvt. Ltd., filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal against a decision involving Bhaveshbhai Hakabhai Vaniya and another. The court issued a second call for the parties to appear, but none were …
Sheeba Mohideen Daud filed a special civil application challenging her discontinuation from service after non‑renewal of contract. Respondent authorities, through the Chief District Health Officer, executed an undertaking to grant her a fresh contract effective 1 February 2026, with the petitioner …
Mahendra Shankarlal Kumavat filed a special civil application before the Gujarat High Court seeking permission to withdraw his petition against the Union of India and others and to be allowed to re‑apply for the same post when a new advertisement is issued. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Rahul …
Gujarat Polysol Chemicals Ltd, represented by Dharmesh PravinChandra Patel, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal against a decision of the State of Gujarat and another respondent. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Ruchit J. Vyas, appeared, but no counsel for the respondents …
The accused filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash FIR No.11191035250793 registered for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The complainant and her husband appeared in …
The complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After a recent decision (Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat) clarifying a victim's right …
Petitioner Hardik Vijayvari, through counsel Albin Kurian, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the Special Civil Application No.15242 of 2025 and to be allowed to file a fresh petition with the same reliefs. The Court, after hearing the counsel, granted the request, stating that the petition …
The petitioner, Priti Lauhar Sahani, filed Special Civil Application No.16520 of 2024 before the High Court of Gujarat. The petitioner, through advocate Rahul Patel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing the application, considered whether such withdrawal …
The appellant, Rajendraprasad Bhagirathbhai Rathod, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat and another respondent. The matter was listed before the High Court of Gujarat, but no party appeared for the hearing despite two calls. No request for adjournment was made by either side. The …
The applicant, Gujarat State Cooperative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Ltd., filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 419(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsha Sanhita (BNSS) Act seeking leave to appeal an order of acquittal dated 14‑10‑2025 in a case under Section 138 of …
Petitioner Kushagra Sirohi, through Advocate Mr. Aaditya Karnavat, filed a Special Civil Application seeking relief against Nirma University and others. During the hearing, the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing the request, granted permission to …
Shaileshbhai Patel was convicted by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaso, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs.5,00,000. The conviction was upheld by the Sessions Court on appeal. Patel filed a revision under …
Kashyap @ Pintu Gopalbhai Shah was preventively detained on 30‑12‑2025 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his wife, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public …
The High Court of Gujarat examined a petition filed by Sonu Manishbhai (also known as Nazrumal) challenging his preventive detention under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The detaining authority had labeled him a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) based on two criminal …
Nitin Rajput was preventively detained on 27‑12‑2025 by the Surat Police Commissioner as a ‘dangerous person’ under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the order through a petition filed by his father, arguing that no material showed any …
Sumit Thakur was detained on 27-12-2025 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the order, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public health, order or tranquility and that the order was passed …
Mohammadashfak, through his wife, challenged a preventive detention order dated 31‑12‑2025 issued by the Director General of Police under Section 2(e) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988. The petitioner argued that no material showed any …
Muhammad Yusuf was preventively detained on 31‑12‑2025 under Section 2(e) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988, on the ground that his alleged illicit drug activities threatened public order. He filed a petition challenging the detention, …
The petitioner, Hamis @ Hamu @ Amu Dharmeshbhai Chunara (Modi), was preventively detained on 1 January 2026 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his mother, arguing that no …
Rahulkumar was preventively detained on 29 December 2025 by the Surat City Commissioner under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, on the ground that he was a "dangerous person" whose conduct threatened public order. He challenged the detention through a …
Sarfaraz @ Guddi was preventively detained on 21‑12‑2025 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the order, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the detention was mechanical. The State …
Balvantbhai was preventively detained on 27 December 2025 as a ‘dangerous person’ under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the order, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the detention was mechanical. The …
Mehulbhai Ashokbhai Pangal was preventively detained on 31‑12‑2025 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his brother, arguing that the detaining authority had no material to show …
Rameshbha Bharabha Hathal was preventively detained on 31‑12‑2025 by the District Magistrate under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his cousin brother, arguing that no material was …
The petitioner, Samirudeshi @ Bond, filed a special criminal application seeking an extension of parole leave to enable him to engage counsel and arrange funds for legal fees. The applicant argued that without additional parole he would be unable to pursue his appeal effectively. The court examined …
The applicant, Mahmad @ Memudo Ishakbhai Turakban, sought regularization of an 85‑day delay in surrendering after his parole leave expired. He claimed that a prior order dated 27‑06‑2025 had continued his parole leave and that he was advised by his lawyer that surrender was not required, but he was …
The applicant, Urviben Rahulkumar Sharma, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court. During the proceedings, the learned counsel for the applicant sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The Court examined the request and noted that it had not yet …
The appellants challenged the award of compensation dated 22‑12‑2021 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, alleging that the Tribunal erred in assessing the deceased’s future income, multiplier, and interest. The deceased, a 21‑year‑old engineering student, died in a road accident on 21‑02‑2010. …
Gokalbai Devraji Tala (Patel) was employed as a sub‑station officer with Rajkot Nagarik Sahakari Bank Ltd. and was dismissed in December 2013 following a charge‑sheet for alleged misappropriation of a loan amount belonging to a customer, Dineshbhai Tilada. The petitioner challenged the dismissal …
The United India Insurance Company Ltd filed a first appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs.4,57,833 to the road accident victim. The High Court examined the appeal but, noting the modest quantum of compensation, chose to dispose …
The United India Insurance Company Ltd filed a First Appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs.4,60,800 to the road‑accident victims. The High Court examined the appeal but, noting that the compensation amount was relatively small, …
The petitioner, a Fire Supervisor with Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Ltd., sought a mandamus directing the employer to consider him for promotion to Station Officer, alleging that he was denied the opportunity due to an adverse remark in his 2003 Annual Confidential Report (ACR) and that the …
The appellant Noormohmad Abderehman Jhaveri & Anr filed a second appeal and a civil revision. During the hearing, the appellant's counsel, Mr. PJ Kanabar, stated that he had no instructions to represent the parties. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal for default, granting the appellant …
The State of Gujarat appealed the acquittal of Dhirubhai Ramabhai Nayka by the Sessions Court, which had found insufficient evidence to prove his involvement in the alleged attempt to murder and insult of his live-in partner, Dhaniben, who suffered severe burns after a dispute. The prosecution …
The State appealed the acquittal of Abdul Rahim, who was alleged to have been found with 1.65 kg of charas in the open dickey of his scooter near Ghodasar Railway Crossing. The trial court acquitted him on the benefit of doubt, finding the prosecution failed to prove conscious possession, ownership …
The State appealed the acquittal of Kanubhai Ganpatsinh Parmar and others for the murder of Dolatsinh, alleging that they conspired and killed him using sticks, iron pipes and strangulation, and then attempted to stage the death as an accident. The prosecution relied solely on circumstantial …
The State appealed the acquittal of Divyakant Arjunbhai Parmar, a police sub‑inspector, who had been charged under Sections 302 and 323 IPC for murder. The prosecution presented eyewitness testimony and medical evidence that the deceased died from abdominal injuries allegedly inflicted by the …
The appellant Noormohmad Abderehman Jhaveri & Anr filed a second appeal and a civil revision. During the hearing, the appellant's counsel, Mr. PJ Kanabar, stated that he had no instructions to represent the parties. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal for default, granting the appellant …
The appellant, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., filed a first appeal against an award of Rs. 3,76,700 granted to the respondents, Leelaben (widow of Shantilal Valsinghbhai Pargi) and others, arising from a road accident. The respondents argued that the appeal should not be entertained because the …
The appellant, Nabros Pharma Pvt. Ltd., filed a criminal appeal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against Finoglobal Exports Ltd. and others. The High Court had earlier issued a notice on 5 July 2025, making the appeal returnable on 4 August 2025. The notice was duly served, but …
The State Bank of India General Insurance Company appealed under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs.3,82,880 to a road accident victim. The High Court examined the appeal but noted that the compensation amount was modest. Consequently, …
The petitioner, Chirag Upendrabhai Tiwari, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking to quash and set aside FIR/Order No. 22272 of 2025. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel, applied for permission to withdraw the said application. The Hon'ble Justice Vimal K. Vyas considered the …
The petitioner, Deendayal Kanhaiyalal Bajaj, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay in preferring the main criminal matter. The application was supported by counsel Mr. Suraj A. Shukla. The State of Gujarat, represented by Addl. Public Prosecutor Mr. Chintan Dave, …
Parulben, the wife of Lalitbhai Maganbhai Parmar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR CR No.11192017250386 (2025) lodged at Ahmedabad Rural Police Station. The applicant argued that custodial …
The petitioner, Yuvraj Kalabhai Chavda, challenged the State of Gujarat for not verifying his caste certificate, which prevented his appointment as Jail Sepoy, Class‑III. He relied on a prior order of a coordinate bench dated 26‑07‑2021, affirmed by a division bench on 25‑11‑2021, which directed …
Navabkhan Huseinkhan Pathan applied for a 30‑day parole leave. The High Court, after considering the applicant’s grounds and the case circumstances, exercised its discretion in his favour. The Court granted parole for 21 days, requiring a personal bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties of the same …
The PWD and Forest Employees Union and others filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking restoration of Special Civil Application No.11841 of 2020. The respondents, the State of Gujarat and others, waived service of the rule. The petitioners, through counsel Ms. Aditi Raol, requested an …
The appellants, legal heirs of the deceased Navinbhai Mavi, appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs 6,10,000 on the ground that the quantum of compensation was insufficient. The High Court examined the calculation of future loss of dependency, loss of estate, funeral expenses and loss …
The petitioners, five of twenty‑three parties, challenged a notice dated 23‑01‑2026 issued under Section 61 of the Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879, which ordered them to vacate premises within seven days without granting any hearing. The respondent authority admitted the factual correctness of the …
The appellants, the deceased's family, appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs 7,65,000 in a 2011 road accident that killed Nileshbhai Ravjibhai Thakor. The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in assessing the deceased's monthly income at Rs 3,000, applying an incorrect multiplier …
The applicant, Vasudevbhai Narmadashankar Pandya, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking successive regular bail after the filing of a chargesheet. The trial court had examined 19 prosecution witnesses and was nearing the conclusion of the trial. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Viral Vyas, …
The workman Kantibhai, employed as a chowkidar from 2007 to 2015, was terminated without due procedure, leading to a reference before the Labour Court which granted reinstatement without backwages. The State of Gujarat filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging the …
The appellants, victims of a motor accident involving a tempo on 1 April 2019, challenged the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.) Dahod under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. They contended that the Tribunal erred in assessing their disability—assigning 50% physical …
The appellants, victims of a motor accident involving a tempo on 1 April 2019, challenged the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.) Dahod under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. They contended that the Tribunal erred in assessing their disability—assigning 50% physical …
The applicant, Dhirubha Ratanji Jadeja, filed a criminal revision application (No. 979 of 2025) against an order of a subordinate court. The applicant, through counsel Darshan M. Varandani, sought the court's permission to withdraw the pending revision application, stating that the charge had …
The plaintiffs, Ramubhai Kamalgiri Gauswami and others, claimed long‑standing possession of houses No.11/103 and 11/104 in Ambaji Panchayat, asserting they had lived there for over 30 years, paid taxes and sought a permanent injunction against the Administrator of the Arasuri Ambaji Devsthan Trust …
The appellants filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s award of Rs.19,46,400 in a 2019 fatal accident case. They argued that the Tribunal erred by not accounting for the deceased’s total monthly income of Rs.14,500 and by …
The appellant, United India Insurance Company Ltd., appealed a tribunal award of Rs.4,17,500 awarded to the heirs of the deceased Raju Bhimabhai for a road accident. The tribunal had also ordered interest at 7.5% per annum and costs against the appellant. No respondents appeared before the High …
The appellant, Govindbhai Lakhubhai Patel, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC against the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal …
The appellants, who were the legal heirs of the deceased Amitkumar Hargovanbhai Makvana, appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, alleging miscalculation of the deceased's monthly income, loss of future dependency, loss of estate, funeral …
The petitioners, Harshaben D/o Premjibhai Ajagiya w/o Sureshbhai Rathod and others, filed a second appeal against a decree in favor of the respondent, Binaben Dilipbhai Makwana. The appeal was listed multiple times, and while notice was served on several appellants, they either remained absent or …
The complainant appealed an acquittal granted by the trial court in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of …
The case involved the murder of Bharat by four accused family members. The trial court convicted Ramesh Salat and Manoj Salat under Sections 302 and 114 IPC, while acquitting Amir and Gopi of murder but convicting Amir under Section 323 for injuring witnesses. The State appealed the acquittals and …
The State of Gujarat filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Labour Court award that reinstated a former Chowkidar, Kantibhai Arjanbhai Bhamat, without backwages. The workman had been employed from 2007‑08 until August 2015 and was terminated without due …
The petitioners filed several criminal miscellaneous and special criminal applications seeking restoration of their matters to the original court files. The applications were listed before the Hon'ble Mr. Justice J. C. Doshi of the Gujarat High Court on 27 January 2026. The court examined the …
The case involved the murder of Bharat by four accused family members. The trial court convicted Ramesh Salat and Manoj Salat under Sections 302 and 114 IPC, while acquitting Amir and Gopi of murder but convicting Amir under Section 323 for injuring witnesses. The State appealed the acquittals and …
Arvindbhai Nathubhai Udesh appealed against his acquittal in a criminal case before the Gujarat High Court. The appellant‑victim filed an affidavit seeking permission to withdraw the appeal, identifying his signature and thumb impression. The court recorded the affidavit and considered the request. …
The petitioner, Poonamben, filed a criminal revision application seeking maintenance against the State of Gujarat and others. The petitioner later informed the Court that a divorce decree had been passed, rendering the maintenance claim moot. The petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to …
The petitioners, employees of a 100% grant‑in‑aid school for children with disabilities, sought to obtain the same benefits (transport allowance, leave encashment, LTC, medical reimbursement, bonus, uniform and washing allowance, etc.) as those granted to employees of government‑run observation and …
Kiritbhai Ishvarbhai Patel filed a special criminal application seeking restoration of the main matter to its original file. The State of Gujarat and another party were respondents. The applicant was represented by Mr. C.P. Champaneri, while the respondents were represented by Mr. Chintan Dave, …
The petitioner, Dineshbhai Ratanjibhai Chaudhary, filed a civil revision application seeking permission to withdraw the petition because the underlying suit had already been disposed of. The petitioner submitted a copy of the order passed in the lower suit, which the court took on record. The court …
The petitioner, Nupur Rajiv Shah, filed a complaint with the Vastrapur Police Station on 26 June 2025 alleging wrongdoing by certain accused persons. After the police recorded her statement, no further action, such as registration of an FIR, was taken. On 26 July 2025, she sent a representation to …
The accident occurred on 23 February 2015 when a bus driven at excessive speed collided with a motorcycle, throwing the pillion rider, the claimant, who sustained grievous injuries. The claimant later died of natural causes on 6 November 2023, and his legal heirs pursued compensation. The Motor …
The State alleged that several officials and contractors colluded to submit false bills under the MGNREGA scheme, causing a loss of approximately Rs 7.30 crore and invoking offences under the IPC such as criminal breach of trust and forgery. The accused were initially granted bail by the Chief …
The State alleged that several officials and contractors colluded to submit false bills under the MGNREGA scheme, causing a loss of approximately Rs 7.30 crore and invoking offences under the IPC such as criminal breach of trust and forgery. The accused were initially granted bail by the Chief …
The State alleged that several officials and contractors colluded to submit false bills under the MGNREGA scheme, causing a loss of approximately Rs 7.30 crore and invoking offences under the IPC such as criminal breach of trust and forgery. The accused were initially granted bail by the Chief …
The State alleged that several officials and contractors colluded to submit false bills under the MGNREGA scheme, causing a loss of approximately Rs 7.30 crore and invoking offences under the IPC such as criminal breach of trust and forgery. The accused were initially granted bail by the Chief …
The State alleged that several officials and contractors colluded to submit false bills under the MGNREGA scheme, causing a loss of approximately Rs 7.30 crore and invoking offences under the IPC such as criminal breach of trust and forgery. The accused were initially granted bail by the Chief …
The State alleged that several officials and contractors colluded to submit false bills under the MGNREGA scheme, causing a loss of approximately Rs 7.30 crore and invoking offences under the IPC such as criminal breach of trust and forgery. The accused were initially granted bail by the Chief …
The State alleged that several officials and contractors colluded to submit false bills under the MGNREGA scheme, causing a loss of approximately Rs 7.30 crore and invoking offences under the IPC such as criminal breach of trust and forgery. The accused were initially granted bail by the Chief …
The State alleged that several officials and contractors colluded to submit false bills under the MGNREGA scheme, causing a loss of approximately Rs 7.30 crore and invoking offences under the IPC such as criminal breach of trust and forgery. The accused were initially granted bail by the Chief …
The State alleged that several officials and contractors colluded to submit false bills under the MGNREGA scheme, causing a loss of approximately Rs 7.30 crore and invoking offences under the IPC such as criminal breach of trust and forgery. The accused were initially granted bail by the Chief …
The petitioner, Parsaram Kundhlik Jagpat, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. O.I. Pathan, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by …
The petitioner filed a civil revision application before the High Court of Gujarat seeking relief. The petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the petition and was granted liberty to institute appropriate proceedings before a suitable court. The court granted the withdrawal …
Virendrabhai Velubhai Parmar was preventively detained on 26‑12‑2025 by the District Magistrate, Bhavnagar, under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 on the ground that he was a "bootlegger" whose activities allegedly threatened public order. The detainee, …
Rukaiya, detained as a "dangerous person" under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, challenged the preventive detention order dated 30‑12‑2025. The petitioner argued that no material showed a disturbance to public health, order or tranquility, and that the order was passed …
Vijaykumar Nanjibhai Katara was preventively detained on 28 April 2025 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger". He challenged the detention, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the order was passed …
Vishal @ Montu Jayantibhai Parmar was preventively detained on 24 October 2025 as a ‘dangerous person’ under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The detainee, through his father, challenged the detention order, arguing that no material was placed before the …
Himmatsinh Karansinh Vanzara was preventively detained on 31‑12‑2025 by the District Magistrate, Porbandar, under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘bootlegger’. His father filed a special criminal application challenging the order, arguing that no …
Ajimmiya (Shahrukh) was preventively detained under a detention order dated 17‑12‑2025 issued by the Ahmedabad Police Commissioner as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the order through a petition filed by his …
The petitioner, Gulam Mustufa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a detention order dated 02.01.2026 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Vadodara, under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The order detained the …
Azaruddin, through his father, challenged a preventive detention order dated 11‑12‑2025 issued by the Director General of Police under Section 2(e) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988. The petitioner argued that no material was placed on …
Kapilbhai Majbutbhai Jebaliya was preventively detained on 2 January 2026 by the District Magistrate, Amreli, as a “dangerous person” under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the order through a petition filed by his cousin, arguing that no …
Shahrukh @ Kaliya Salimbhai Shaikh was detained under a preventive detention order dated 25‑12‑2025 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad, invoking Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person." The detainee, through his mother, …
The High Court of Gujarat considered a petition filed by Nitin @ Sunny @ Gando Vijayshankar Jaymangal Jaiswal (Kori), through his mother, challenging his preventive detention under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The petitioner argued that no material was …
The accused filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash FIR No.11191031230883/2023 and the pending criminal case, alleging that the dispute with the complainant had been amicably settled through a mutual divorce suit. The complainant, present in court, submitted an affidavit …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay in a pending matter before the High Court of Gujarat. They alleged that sufficient cause existed for the delay and submitted an affidavit supporting their claim. The Public Prosecutor opposed the application on …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay in a pending matter before the High Court of Gujarat. The application alleged that sufficient cause existed for the delay. The court examined the averments and was satisfied that the petitioners had demonstrated …
Nemichand Madanji Prajapati and another filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 93‑day delay in filing a restoration application (SCR.A No. 4900/2025) in the main criminal matter. The respondents, the State of Gujarat, opposed the condonation. The Court examined the …
The applicant, Shaileshbhai @Shayalo Shivabhai Jambucha, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail to attend his sister's marriage. The State opposed the application, but the prosecutor waived service of notice. The court examined the seriousness of the alleged offence, the …
The accused Khetabhai Khodabhai Bharwad applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 after a charge‑sheet was filed for alleged forgery and related offences (IPC §§ 465, 467, 471, 120B, 114). The prosecution opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the …
M/S U S Standard Ispat Pvt. Ltd. filed a tax appeal before the Gujarat High Court against the Dy. Commissioner of State Tax. The appellant’s counsel, Mr. J.F. Mehta, informed the Court that despite diligent efforts he could not locate or contact the appellant. The Court noted that the appellant …
Petitioner Mahdihasan NasirMohammed Shaikh filed a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel produced a communication dated 10 January 2026 in which the petitioner instructed the counsel to withdraw the petition. The counsel sought the …
The Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (GSRTC) appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award concerning a 2015 road accident in which a bus driver collided with a motorcyclist, Mahammadkhan Umarkhan Baloch, who later died. GSRTC argued that the Tribunal erred by not attributing contributory …
The insurance company filed a first appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs.3,04,227 to the victims of a road accident. The High Court examined the appeal but, noting that the amount involved was modest, chose to dispose of the …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 185‑day delay in filing their first appeal. The respondents did not appear before the court. The petitioners argued that the delay was caused by genuine reasons and not by any dilatory intent. The …
The appellant, Parsottambhai Pratapbhai Patel, was injured in a road accident on 06‑01‑2020 and filed a Motor Accident Claim (MAC) petition. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation based on a monthly income of Rs 8,070, without applying the prevailing minimum‑wage rate or …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of Special Criminal Application No. 17915 of 2025, which had been dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the failure to remove office objections. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, opposed the restoration. The court …
The appellant, Rajendrasinh Chandrasinh Kher, failed to appear for the second session of the fourth round of the appeal. Consequently, the High Court of Gujarat dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the case were addressed. The order was pronounced by Justice Hasmukh …
Alstom Transport India Ltd. (ATIL) sought to quash the order allowing an appeal that set aside a refund sanction granted to its predecessor, Alstom Rail Transportation India Ltd. (ARTIPL), after ARTIPL’s amalgamation into ATIL. The dispute centered on whether ARTIPL, which had transferred only part …
Alstom Transport India Ltd. (ATIL) sought to quash the order allowing an appeal that set aside a refund sanction granted to its predecessor, Alstom Rail Transportation India Ltd. (ARTIPL), after ARTIPL’s amalgamation into ATIL. The dispute centered on whether ARTIPL, which had transferred only part …
Alstom Transport India Ltd. (ATIL) sought to quash the order allowing an appeal that set aside a refund sanction granted to its predecessor, Alstom Rail Transportation India Ltd. (ARTIPL), after ARTIPL’s amalgamation into ATIL. The dispute centered on whether ARTIPL, which had transferred only part …
Alstom Transport India Ltd. (ATIL) sought to quash the order allowing an appeal that set aside a refund sanction granted to its predecessor, Alstom Rail Transportation India Ltd. (ARTIPL), after ARTIPL’s amalgamation into ATIL. The dispute centered on whether ARTIPL, which had transferred only part …
Alstom Transport India Ltd. (ATIL) sought to quash the order allowing an appeal that set aside a refund sanction granted to its predecessor, Alstom Rail Transportation India Ltd. (ARTIPL), after ARTIPL’s amalgamation into ATIL. The dispute centered on whether ARTIPL, which had transferred only part …
Alstom Transport India Ltd. (ATIL) sought to quash the order allowing an appeal that set aside a refund sanction granted to its predecessor, Alstom Rail Transportation India Ltd. (ARTIPL), after ARTIPL’s amalgamation into ATIL. The dispute centered on whether ARTIPL, which had transferred only part …
Alstom Transport India Ltd. (ATIL) sought to quash the order allowing an appeal that set aside a refund sanction granted to its predecessor, Alstom Rail Transportation India Ltd. (ARTIPL), after ARTIPL’s amalgamation into ATIL. The dispute centered on whether ARTIPL, which had transferred only part …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of Special Criminal Application No.1310 of 2025, which had been dismissed for non‑prosecution. The respondents opposed the restoration. The court examined the averments made in the petition and considered the principle of …
The deceased Gaurangkumar Arvindbhai Rohit was fatally injured when a luxury bus collided with his motorcycle on 9 October 2018. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded him a compensation of Rs.15,89,000, which the claimants appealed on the ground of quantum under Section 173 of the Motor …
The appellant, a 26‑year‑old rickshaw passenger, was injured in a 2023 accident caused by the negligent driver of a rickshaw owned by the first respondent. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded her Rs 6,69,900, using a monthly income of Rs 7,500 despite the prevailing minimum wage of Rs 12,000 …
The case concerns an armed dacoity on a State Transport bus on 20 August 2010, during which four assailants fired at the driver and a passenger, looted valuables and escaped in an Indica car, also firing at a police checkpost. The accused were charged under IPC Sections 395, 396 and 120B, and …
The applicant, Devanand Raymalbai Herbha, filed a contempt application alleging non‑compliance with a prior order. The respondent, Vikas Sahay, Director General of Police, and another party contested the claim. The applicant's counsel argued that the order had been fully complied with, rendering the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of a revision application that had been dismissed for default due to non‑removal of office objections. The High Court examined the memorandum filed by the petitioners and considered whether the procedural default could be …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 30‑day delay in filing a restoration application, invoking Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The respondent, the State, waived service of notice. The court examined the reasons for the delay and found them …
The petitioner, Dinkesh Nangalia, filed a special civil application against the Principal of Bhagwan Mahavir College of Legal Education and others, seeking permission to withdraw the petition and to be allowed to approach the University Grants Commission (UGC). The petitioner, through Advocate P.S. …
The petitioners filed two civil applications seeking condonation of a 317‑day delay in bringing the legal heirs of the original petitioner onto the record of the main Special Civil Application and to join them as petitioners. The Court, satisfied that the delay was sufficiently explained, allowed …
The petitioners, represented by Mr. Vikas Nair, sought to withdraw Special Civil Application No. 14721 of 2025, which challenged an order of the Education Tribunal concerning the appointment of a Head of Department at Hemchandracharya North Gujarat University. The University, through its counsel, …
Rahulbhai, through his father, challenged a preventive detention order dated 31‑12‑2025 issued by the Director General of Police under Section 2(e) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988. The petitioner argued that no material was placed before …
Mohammad Ubed challenged his preventive detention order dated 28‑12‑2025 issued by the Surat Police Commissioner under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, alleging he was a "dangerous person". The petitioner argued that no material showed any disturbance to …
Surendrasinh Laxmansinh Bhati was detained on 25‑12‑2025 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his next friend. The petitioner argued that no material was placed before the detaining …
Umar @ Daku was preventively detained on 22‑12‑2025 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘dangerous person’. He challenged the order, arguing that no material showed his conduct disturbed public health, order or tranquility. The State contended that …
Nadeembhai Kadarbhai Barejiya was detained on 1 January 2026 by the District Magistrate of Amreli under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention through a special criminal application, arguing that the detaining …
